BCAL
Price
$19.00
Change
+$0.23 (+1.23%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
608.49M
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HFBL
Price
$18.50
Change
-$0.60 (-3.14%)
Updated
Feb 4, 12:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
56.12M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCAL vs HFBL

Header iconBCAL vs HFBL Comparison
Open Charts BCAL vs HFBLBanner chart's image
California Ban
Price$19.00
Change+$0.23 (+1.23%)
Volume$6.34K
Capitalization608.49M
Home Federal Ban
Price$18.50
Change-$0.60 (-3.14%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization56.12M
BCAL vs HFBL Comparison Chart in %
BCAL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HFBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCAL vs. HFBL commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCAL is a Hold and HFBL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BCAL: $18.77 vs. HFBL: $18.10)
Brand notoriety: BCAL and HFBL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCAL: 147% vs. HFBL: 16%
Market capitalization -- BCAL: $608.49M vs. HFBL: $56.12M
BCAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $608.49M. HFBL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $56.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHFBL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HFBL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCAL is a better buy in the long-term than HFBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCAL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HFBL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HFBL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BCAL and HFBL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BCAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.84% price change this week, while HFBL (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCAL is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.10% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCAL($608M) has a higher market cap than HFBL($56.1M). HFBL has higher P/E ratio than BCAL: HFBL (10.79) vs BCAL (9.73). HFBL YTD gains are higher at: 1.278 vs. BCAL (0.536). HFBL has less debt than BCAL: HFBL (4M) vs BCAL (52.6M). BCAL has higher revenues than HFBL: BCAL (180M) vs HFBL (21.7M).
BCALHFBLBCAL / HFBL
Capitalization608M56.1M1,084%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.5361.27842%
P/E Ratio9.7310.7990%
Revenue180M21.7M829%
Total CashN/A9.93M-
Total Debt52.6M4M1,315%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCAL vs HFBL: Fundamental Ratings
BCAL
HFBL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5675
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4762
SMR RATING
1..100
3169
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5343
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9959
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HFBL's Valuation (32) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BCAL (33) in the null industry. This means that HFBL’s stock grew similarly to BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

BCAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as HFBL (62) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BCAL’s stock grew similarly to HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

BCAL's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFBL (69) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BCAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

HFBL's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BCAL (53) in the null industry. This means that HFBL’s stock grew similarly to BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

HFBL's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCAL (99) in the null industry. This means that HFBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCALHFBL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCAL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HFBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPCIX40.050.56
+1.42%
Timothy Plan Israel Common Values C
TIRRX10.890.04
+0.37%
T. Rowe Price Real Estate I
MWEIX42.51-0.36
-0.84%
MFS Global Equity I
RYFAX90.18-1.00
-1.10%
Rydex Financial Services H
PNOYX137.71-1.61
-1.16%
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y

BCAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCAL has been closely correlated with CWBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCAL jumps, then CWBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCAL
1D Price
Change %
BCAL100%
+2.46%
CWBC - BCAL
81%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
TRMK - BCAL
80%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
FRME - BCAL
79%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
UBSI - BCAL
79%
Closely correlated
+2.11%
FULT - BCAL
79%
Closely correlated
+2.66%
More

HFBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HFBL and FUSB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HFBL and FUSB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFBL
1D Price
Change %
HFBL100%
N/A
FUSB - HFBL
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
BCAL - HFBL
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.46%
FCAP - HFBL
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.04%
OVBC - HFBL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
TFIN - HFBL
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
More