BCAL
Price
$19.16
Change
+$0.31 (+1.64%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
621.13M
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FMBH
Price
$44.59
Change
+$0.59 (+1.34%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.07B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCAL vs FMBH

Header iconBCAL vs FMBH Comparison
Open Charts BCAL vs FMBHBanner chart's image
California Ban
Price$19.16
Change+$0.31 (+1.64%)
Volume$284.51K
Capitalization621.13M
First Mid Bancshares
Price$44.59
Change+$0.59 (+1.34%)
Volume$107.58K
Capitalization1.07B
BCAL vs FMBH Comparison Chart in %
BCAL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCAL vs. FMBH commentary
Feb 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCAL is a StrongBuy and FMBH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 08, 2026
Stock price -- (BCAL: $19.16 vs. FMBH: $44.59)
Brand notoriety: BCAL and FMBH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCAL: 106% vs. FMBH: 99%
Market capitalization -- BCAL: $621.13M vs. FMBH: $1.07B
BCAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $621.13M. FMBH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $160.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFMBH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FMBH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCAL is a better buy in the long-term than FMBH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCAL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMBH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FMBH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCAL is a better buy in the short-term than FMBH.

Price Growth

BCAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.50% price change this week, while FMBH (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCAL is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.80% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBH($1.07B) has a higher market cap than BCAL($621M). FMBH has higher P/E ratio than BCAL: FMBH (11.63) vs BCAL (9.93). FMBH YTD gains are higher at: 14.333 vs. BCAL (2.625). BCAL has less debt than FMBH: BCAL (52.6M) vs FMBH (363M). FMBH has higher revenues than BCAL: FMBH (339M) vs BCAL (180M).
BCALFMBHBCAL / FMBH
Capitalization621M1.07B58%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.62514.33318%
P/E Ratio9.9311.6385%
Revenue180M339M53%
Total CashN/A16.1M-
Total Debt52.6M363M14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCAL vs FMBH: Fundamental Ratings
BCAL
FMBH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
317
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4561
SMR RATING
1..100
3125
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10056
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCAL's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMBH (98) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BCAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

BCAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FMBH (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BCAL’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BCAL (31) in the null industry. This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BCAL (51) in the null industry. This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCAL (100) in the null industry. This means that FMBH’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCALFMBH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCAL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RDVIX2.500.06
+2.46%
Royce Smid-Cap Total Return Investment
SDGAX117.812.63
+2.28%
DWS Capital Growth A
AMTZX10.760.18
+1.70%
AB All Market Real Return Z
SRECX14.260.18
+1.28%
PGIM Select Real Estate C
FMAMX89.75N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Sel A

BCAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCAL has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCAL jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCAL
1D Price
Change %
BCAL100%
+1.64%
FMBH - BCAL
83%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
FNB - BCAL
83%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
FULT - BCAL
83%
Closely correlated
+2.16%
TRMK - BCAL
83%
Closely correlated
+2.29%
SRCE - BCAL
82%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
More