BCAL
Price
$17.32
Change
+$0.03 (+0.17%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
81 days until earnings call
CCRDF
Price
$5.39
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
Ad is loading...

BCAL vs CCRDF

Header iconBCAL vs CCRDF Comparison
Open Charts BCAL vs CCRDFBanner chart's image
California Ban
Price$17.32
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
Volume$72K
CapitalizationN/A
Concordia Financial Group
Price$5.39
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
BCAL vs CCRDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCAL vs. CCRDF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCAL is a StrongBuy and CCRDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (BCAL: $17.32 vs. CCRDF: $5.39)
Brand notoriety: BCAL and CCRDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCAL: 100% vs. CCRDF: 15%
Market capitalization -- BCAL: $274.81M vs. CCRDF: $5.59B
BCAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $274.81M. CCRDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCCRDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CCRDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCAL is a better buy in the long-term than CCRDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCAL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BCAL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BCAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.15% price change this week, while CCRDF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCAL is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.80% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCRDF($5.59B) has a higher market cap than BCAL($275M). CCRDF has higher P/E ratio than BCAL: CCRDF (12.48) vs BCAL (10.54). CCRDF YTD gains are higher at: 22.222 vs. BCAL (-0.173). BCAL has less debt than CCRDF: BCAL (115M) vs CCRDF (2.28T). CCRDF has higher revenues than BCAL: CCRDF (268B) vs BCAL (97.5M).
BCALCCRDFBCAL / CCRDF
Capitalization275M5.59B5%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.17322.222-1%
P/E Ratio10.5412.4884%
Revenue97.5M268B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt115M2.28T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCAL vs CCRDF: Fundamental Ratings
BCAL
CCRDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2034
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26100
SMR RATING
1..100
351
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2167
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCRDF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCAL (77). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

BCAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCRDF (100). This means that BCAL’s stock grew significantly faster than CCRDF’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCAL (35). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

BCAL's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CCRDF (52). This means that BCAL’s stock grew similarly to CCRDF’s over the last 12 months.

BCAL's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCRDF (67). This means that BCAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCRDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BCAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

BCAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCAL has been loosely correlated with CLBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCAL jumps, then CLBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCAL
1D Price
Change %
BCAL100%
+0.17%
CLBK - BCAL
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
CCB - BCAL
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
CFB - BCAL
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
CARE - BCAL
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
AX - BCAL
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
More

CCRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCRDF and SUTNY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCRDF and SUTNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCRDF
1D Price
Change %
CCRDF100%
N/A
SUTNY - CCRDF
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
LLAZF - CCRDF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFG - CCRDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.31%
BCAL - CCRDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
DSBX - CCRDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.15%
More