BCAL
Price
$17.10
Change
+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
556.05M
51 days until earnings call
CCRDF
Price
$7.41
Change
+$0.66 (+9.78%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
8.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCAL vs CCRDF

Header iconBCAL vs CCRDF Comparison
Open Charts BCAL vs CCRDFBanner chart's image
California Ban
Price$17.10
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Volume$71.6K
Capitalization556.05M
Concordia Financial Group
Price$7.41
Change+$0.66 (+9.78%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization8.6B
BCAL vs CCRDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCAL vs. CCRDF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCAL is a Buy and CCRDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BCAL: $17.10 vs. CCRDF: $7.41)
Brand notoriety: BCAL and CCRDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCAL: 60% vs. CCRDF: 126%
Market capitalization -- BCAL: $556.05M vs. CCRDF: $8.6B
BCAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $556.05M. CCRDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $8.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCAL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCCRDF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CCRDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCRDF is a better buy in the long-term than BCAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCAL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCRDF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCAL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CCRDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCAL is a better buy in the short-term than CCRDF.

Price Growth

BCAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.54% price change this week, while CCRDF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCAL is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCRDF($8.6B) has a higher market cap than BCAL($556M). BCAL has higher P/E ratio than CCRDF: BCAL (19.00) vs CCRDF (15.31). CCRDF YTD gains are higher at: 26.992 vs. BCAL (3.386). BCAL has less debt than CCRDF: BCAL (69.6M) vs CCRDF (2.26T). CCRDF has higher revenues than BCAL: CCRDF (314B) vs BCAL (173M).
BCALCCRDFBCAL / CCRDF
Capitalization556M8.6B6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.38626.99213%
P/E Ratio19.0015.31124%
Revenue173M314B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt69.6M2.26T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCAL vs CCRDF: Fundamental Ratings
BCAL
CCRDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
328
SMR RATING
1..100
361
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3627
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4430

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCRDF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as BCAL (74). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as BCAL (32). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCAL (36). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BCAL (46). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as BCAL (36). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCALCCRDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JDSCX34.210.19
+0.56%
JPMorgan Small Cap Blend I
KGDCX19.720.10
+0.51%
DWS Global Small Cap C
RYRCX46.980.15
+0.32%
Rydex Retailing C
GCVRX24.82-0.04
-0.16%
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts R
OTCNX80.12-0.18
-0.22%
Invesco Discovery Large Cap R

BCAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCAL has been closely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCAL jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCAL
1D Price
Change %
BCAL100%
+0.06%
SHBI - BCAL
80%
Closely correlated
-2.02%
TRMK - BCAL
80%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
CWBC - BCAL
80%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
FMBH - BCAL
79%
Closely correlated
-1.28%
FNB - BCAL
79%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
More

CCRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCRDF and SUTNY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCRDF and SUTNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCRDF
1D Price
Change %
CCRDF100%
N/A
SUTNY - CCRDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
LLAZF - CCRDF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFG - CCRDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
BCAL - CCRDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
DSBX - CCRDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More