It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BCAL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCCB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BCAL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BCAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.06%.
BCAL is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.
CCB is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
BCAL | CCB | BCAL / CCB | |
Capitalization | 275M | 520M | 53% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -1.451 | 8.209 | -18% |
P/E Ratio | 10.54 | 11.68 | 90% |
Revenue | 97.5M | 352M | 28% |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 115M | 53.9M | 213% |
BCAL | CCB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BCAL's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as CCB (93) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BCAL’s stock grew similarly to CCB’s over the last 12 months.
CCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCAL (39) in the null industry. This means that CCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCAL’s over the last 12 months.
CCB's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCAL (50) in the null industry. This means that CCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCAL’s over the last 12 months.
CCB's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BCAL (50) in the null industry. This means that CCB’s stock grew similarly to BCAL’s over the last 12 months.
BCAL's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CCB (6) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BCAL’s stock grew similarly to CCB’s over the last 12 months.
BCAL | CCB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago56% | 5 days ago55% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago41% | 5 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago47% | 5 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago37% | 5 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago43% | 5 days ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago37% | 5 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago58% | 5 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago61% | 20 days ago64% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago57% | 5 days ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago30% | 5 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCAL has been closely correlated with CFB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCAL jumps, then CFB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BCAL | 100% | -0.31% | ||
CFB - BCAL | 67% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
CCB - BCAL | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
CARE - BCAL | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
SFST - BCAL | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
TCBI - BCAL | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCB has been closely correlated with TCBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCB jumps, then TCBI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CCB | 100% | +2.12% | ||
TCBI - CCB | 69% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
CFB - CCB | 68% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
MCB - CCB | 67% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
AX - CCB | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
BLFY - CCB | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
More |