BCAL
Price
$16.53
Change
+$0.23 (+1.41%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
274.81M
28 days until earnings call
BDGSF
Price
$55.65
Change
-$12.55 (-18.40%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.92B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCAL vs BDGSF

Header iconBCAL vs BDGSF Comparison
Open Charts BCAL vs BDGSFBanner chart's image
California Ban
Price$16.53
Change+$0.23 (+1.41%)
Volume$101.49K
Capitalization274.81M
Bank of Ga Group
Price$55.65
Change-$12.55 (-18.40%)
Volume$330
Capitalization1.92B
BCAL vs BDGSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BDGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCAL vs. BDGSF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCAL is a Buy and BDGSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BCAL: $16.53 vs. BDGSF: $55.65)
Brand notoriety: BCAL and BDGSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCAL: 96% vs. BDGSF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BCAL: $274.81M vs. BDGSF: $1.92B
BCAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $274.81M. BDGSF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBDGSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BDGSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BDGSF is a better buy in the long-term than BCAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCAL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BDGSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BDGSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BDGSF is a better buy in the short-term than BCAL.

Price Growth

BCAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.89% price change this week, while BDGSF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCAL is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BDGSF($1.92B) has a higher market cap than BCAL($275M). BCAL has higher P/E ratio than BDGSF: BCAL (10.54) vs BDGSF (3.38). BCAL YTD gains are higher at: -0.060 vs. BDGSF (-8.108). BCAL has less debt than BDGSF: BCAL (115M) vs BDGSF (3.53B). BDGSF has higher revenues than BCAL: BDGSF (2.03B) vs BCAL (97.5M).
BCALBDGSFBCAL / BDGSF
Capitalization275M1.92B14%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.060-8.1081%
P/E Ratio10.543.38312%
Revenue97.5M2.03B5%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt115M3.53B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCAL vs BDGSF: Fundamental Ratings
BCAL
BDGSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3412
SMR RATING
1..100
298
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4462
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
449
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BDGSF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCAL (74). This means that BDGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

BDGSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as BCAL (34). This means that BDGSF’s stock grew similarly to BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

BDGSF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as BCAL (29). This means that BDGSF’s stock grew similarly to BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

BCAL's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BDGSF (62). This means that BCAL’s stock grew similarly to BDGSF’s over the last 12 months.

BCAL's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BDGSF (49). This means that BCAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than BDGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCALBDGSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
62%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BDGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTDPF6.47N/A
N/A
BARRATT REDROW PLC
CHCJY19.95N/A
N/A
China Citic Bank Corp., Ltd.
NSVGF0.01N/A
N/A
Nass Vy Gateway Ltd.
RNDOF9.88N/A
N/A
Round One Corp.
BBKCF0.08-0.01
-6.29%
BIGG Digital Assets Inc.

BCAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCAL has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCAL jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCAL
1D Price
Change %
BCAL100%
+1.41%
FNB - BCAL
80%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
TRMK - BCAL
79%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
FMBH - BCAL
79%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
ASB - BCAL
79%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
UCB - BCAL
78%
Closely correlated
+1.24%
More

BDGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDGSF has been loosely correlated with MTPOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BDGSF jumps, then MTPOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDGSF
1D Price
Change %
BDGSF100%
N/A
MTPOY - BDGSF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PBKC - BDGSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBTT - BDGSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
SOBS - BDGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCAL - BDGSF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
More