BC
Price
$55.63
Change
-$1.72 (-3.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.51B
40 days until earnings call
MAT
Price
$18.80
Change
-$0.50 (-2.59%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.81B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BC vs MAT

Header iconBC vs MAT Comparison
Open Charts BC vs MATBanner chart's image
Brunswick
Price$55.63
Change-$1.72 (-3.00%)
Volume$798.18K
Capitalization6.51B
Mattel
Price$18.80
Change-$0.50 (-2.59%)
Volume$1.89M
Capitalization6.81B
BC vs MAT Comparison Chart
Loading...
BC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BC vs. MAT commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BC is a StrongBuy and MAT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BC: $55.63 vs. MAT: $18.80)
Brand notoriety: BC and MAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BC: 70% vs. MAT: 44%
Market capitalization -- BC: $6.51B vs. MAT: $6.81B
BC [@Recreational Products] is valued at $6.51B. MAT’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $6.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BC and MAT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BC is a better buy in the short-term than MAT.

Price Growth

BC (@Recreational Products) experienced а -1.12% price change this week, while MAT (@Recreational Products) price change was -0.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

BC is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

MAT is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-0.65% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAT($6.82B) and BC($6.51B) have the same market capitalization . MAT has higher P/E ratio than BC: MAT (32.81) vs BC (15.64). MAT YTD gains are higher at: 6.035 vs. BC (-12.693). BC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.01B vs. MAT (767M). MAT has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. BC (469M). MAT (2.59B) and BC (2.59B) have identical debt. BC has higher revenues than MAT: BC (6.4B) vs MAT (5.44B).
BCMATBC / MAT
Capitalization6.51B6.82B96%
EBITDA1.01B767M132%
Gain YTD-12.6936.035-210%
P/E Ratio15.6432.8148%
Revenue6.4B5.44B118%
Total Cash469M1.26B37%
Total Debt2.59B2.59B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BC vs MAT: Fundamental Ratings
BC
MAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1967
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8646
SMR RATING
1..100
8438
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
592
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BC's Valuation (27) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAT (85). This means that BC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAT’s over the last 12 months.

MAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BC (86). This means that MAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BC’s over the last 12 months.

MAT's SMR Rating (38) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BC (84). This means that MAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BC’s over the last 12 months.

MAT's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as BC (59). This means that MAT’s stock grew similarly to BC’s over the last 12 months.

BC's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAT (92). This means that BC’s stock grew significantly faster than MAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCMAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NHPBP13.750.17
+1.25%
National Healthcare Properties Inc
ASTH25.75-0.60
-2.28%
Astrana Health
RHI42.65-1.14
-2.60%
Robert Half
HIPO28.26-1.30
-4.40%
Hippo Holdings
PLBY1.40-0.10
-6.67%
PLBY Group

BC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BC has been closely correlated with PII. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BC jumps, then PII could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BC
1D Price
Change %
BC100%
-3.00%
PII - BC
82%
Closely correlated
-2.54%
LCII - BC
79%
Closely correlated
-2.68%
MBUU - BC
78%
Closely correlated
-3.81%
HOG - BC
76%
Closely correlated
-2.54%
WGO - BC
75%
Closely correlated
-4.28%
More

MAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAT has been loosely correlated with HAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAT jumps, then HAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAT
1D Price
Change %
MAT100%
-2.59%
HAS - MAT
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.43%
JAKK - MAT
56%
Loosely correlated
-8.00%
YETI - MAT
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.61%
GOLF - MAT
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.92%
BC - MAT
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.00%
More