BC
Price
$66.75
Change
-$0.09 (-0.13%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
38 days until earnings call
HAS
Price
$57.58
Change
+$1.07 (+1.89%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
57 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BC vs HAS

Header iconBC vs HAS Comparison
Open Charts BC vs HASBanner chart's image
Brunswick
Price$66.75
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
Volume$1.81M
CapitalizationN/A
Hasbro
Price$57.58
Change+$1.07 (+1.89%)
Volume$5.98M
CapitalizationN/A
BC vs HAS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BC vs. HAS commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BC is a Hold and HAS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (BC: $66.75 vs. HAS: $57.58)
Brand notoriety: BC and HAS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BC: 293% vs. HAS: 352%
Market capitalization -- BC: $6.51B vs. HAS: $7.84B
BC [@Recreational Products] is valued at $6.51B. HAS’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $7.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHAS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BC and HAS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the short-term than BC.

Price Growth

BC (@Recreational Products) experienced а -9.29% price change this week, while HAS (@Recreational Products) price change was -6.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

BC is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

HAS is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-2.41% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAS($7.84B) has a higher market cap than BC($6.51B). HAS has higher P/E ratio than BC: HAS (75.76) vs BC (15.64). HAS YTD gains are higher at: 18.189 vs. BC (-29.570). BC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.01B vs. HAS (-863.2M). HAS has more cash in the bank: 545M vs. BC (469M). BC has less debt than HAS: BC (2.59B) vs HAS (3.5B). BC has higher revenues than HAS: BC (6.4B) vs HAS (5B).
BCHASBC / HAS
Capitalization6.51B7.84B83%
EBITDA1.01B-863.2M-117%
Gain YTD-29.57018.189-163%
P/E Ratio15.6475.7621%
Revenue6.4B5B128%
Total Cash469M545M86%
Total Debt2.59B3.5B74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BC vs HAS: Fundamental Ratings
BC
HAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71100
SMR RATING
1..100
6097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
284
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAS's Valuation (21) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as BC (31). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to BC’s over the last 12 months.

BC's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as HAS (100). This means that BC’s stock grew similarly to HAS’s over the last 12 months.

BC's SMR Rating (60) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAS (97). This means that BC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as BC (82). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to BC’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as BC (28). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to BC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCHAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

BC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BC has been closely correlated with PII. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BC jumps, then PII could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BC
1D Price
Change %
BC100%
-0.13%
PII - BC
78%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
LCII - BC
75%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
WGO - BC
73%
Closely correlated
-3.76%
HOG - BC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
THO - BC
67%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
More

HAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAS has been loosely correlated with MODG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAS jumps, then MODG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAS
1D Price
Change %
HAS100%
+1.89%
MODG - HAS
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
YETI - HAS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
FNKO - HAS
36%
Loosely correlated
+7.30%
BC - HAS
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
PII - HAS
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
More