BBVXF
Price
$19.21
Change
+$0.22 (+1.16%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
111.31B
NAUBF
Price
$28.50
Change
+$1.76 (+6.58%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
87.8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBVXF vs NAUBF

Header iconBBVXF vs NAUBF Comparison
Open Charts BBVXF vs NAUBFBanner chart's image
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A
Price$19.21
Change+$0.22 (+1.16%)
Volume$3.27K
Capitalization111.31B
National Australia Bank Ltd. (Victoria, Australia)
Price$28.50
Change+$1.76 (+6.58%)
Volume$535
Capitalization87.8B
BBVXF vs NAUBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BBVXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBVXF vs. NAUBF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBVXF is a StrongBuy and NAUBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BBVXF: $19.22 vs. NAUBF: $28.50)
Brand notoriety: BBVXF and NAUBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBVXF: 9% vs. NAUBF: 88%
Market capitalization -- BBVXF: $111.31B vs. NAUBF: $87.8B
BBVXF [@Major Banks] is valued at $111.31B. NAUBF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $87.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $869.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $136.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBVXF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNAUBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BBVXF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NAUBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BBVXF and NAUBF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBVXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAUBF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBVXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NAUBF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BBVXF is a better buy in the short-term than NAUBF.

Price Growth

BBVXF (@Major Banks) experienced а -1.84% price change this week, while NAUBF (@Major Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +130.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.79% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBVXF($111B) has a higher market cap than NAUBF($87.8B). NAUBF has higher P/E ratio than BBVXF: NAUBF (19.34) vs BBVXF (9.30). BBVXF YTD gains are higher at: 96.724 vs. NAUBF (23.805). BBVXF has less debt than NAUBF: BBVXF (71.8B) vs NAUBF (212B). BBVXF has higher revenues than NAUBF: BBVXF (39.8B) vs NAUBF (20.7B).
BBVXFNAUBFBBVXF / NAUBF
Capitalization111B87.8B126%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD96.72423.805406%
P/E Ratio9.3019.3448%
Revenue39.8B20.7B192%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt71.8B212B34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBVXF vs NAUBF: Fundamental Ratings
BBVXF
NAUBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1497
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
424
SMR RATING
1..100
34
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1737
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BBVXF's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (80). This means that BBVXF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

BBVXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (24). This means that BBVXF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

BBVXF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (4). This means that BBVXF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

BBVXF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (46). This means that BBVXF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

BBVXF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (37). This means that BBVXF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBVXFNAUBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBVXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLWS4.770.05
+1.06%
1-800-FLOWERS.COM
INTU698.265.58
+0.81%
Intuit
RYTM99.160.02
+0.02%
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals
PLAB23.22-0.69
-2.89%
Photronics
IPWR5.05-0.16
-2.98%
Ideal Power

BBVXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBVXF and NAUBF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBVXF and NAUBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBVXF
1D Price
Change %
BBVXF100%
+1.13%
NAUBF - BBVXF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCLYF - BBVXF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
AGRPF - BBVXF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACGBY - BBVXF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
ABMRF - BBVXF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.90%
More

NAUBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAUBF and BBVXF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAUBF and BBVXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAUBF
1D Price
Change %
NAUBF100%
N/A
BBVXF - NAUBF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
RBSPF - NAUBF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
INGVF - NAUBF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
MBFJF - NAUBF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
SCBFF - NAUBF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.55%
More