BBVXF
Price
$18.26
Change
+$0.26 (+1.44%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
104.71B
BCLYF
Price
$4.96
Change
-$0.07 (-1.39%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
68.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBVXF vs BCLYF

Header iconBBVXF vs BCLYF Comparison
Open Charts BBVXF vs BCLYFBanner chart's image
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A
Price$18.26
Change+$0.26 (+1.44%)
Volume$11.37K
Capitalization104.71B
Barclays
Price$4.96
Change-$0.07 (-1.39%)
Volume$22.53K
Capitalization68.06B
BBVXF vs BCLYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BBVXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBVXF vs. BCLYF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBVXF is a StrongBuy and BCLYF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BBVXF: $18.26 vs. BCLYF: $4.97)
Brand notoriety: BBVXF and BCLYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBVXF: 27% vs. BCLYF: 64%
Market capitalization -- BBVXF: $104.71B vs. BCLYF: $68.06B
BBVXF [@Major Banks] is valued at $104.71B. BCLYF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $68.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $809.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $133.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBVXF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBCLYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BBVXF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BCLYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCLYF is a better buy in the long-term than BBVXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBVXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCLYF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBVXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BCLYF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCLYF is a better buy in the short-term than BBVXF.

Price Growth

BBVXF (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.97% price change this week, while BCLYF (@Major Banks) price change was +3.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +130.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.22% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBVXF($105B) has a higher market cap than BCLYF($68.1B). BCLYF (9.12) and BBVXF (8.90) have similar P/E ratio . BBVXF YTD gains are higher at: 86.956 vs. BCLYF (50.000). BBVXF has less debt than BCLYF: BBVXF (71.8B) vs BCLYF (117B). BBVXF has higher revenues than BCLYF: BBVXF (39.8B) vs BCLYF (27.8B).
BBVXFBCLYFBBVXF / BCLYF
Capitalization105B68.1B154%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD86.95650.000174%
P/E Ratio8.909.1298%
Revenue39.8B27.8B143%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt71.8B117B61%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBVXF vs BCLYF: Fundamental Ratings
BBVXF
BCLYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
416
SMR RATING
1..100
34
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1749
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCLYF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as BBVXF (76). This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to BBVXF’s over the last 12 months.

BBVXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (16). This means that BBVXF’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BBVXF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (4). This means that BBVXF’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BBVXF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (43). This means that BBVXF’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BBVXF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (49). This means that BBVXF’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBVXFBCLYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBVXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INMD14.980.57
+3.96%
InMode Ltd
KNF80.371.78
+2.26%
Knife River Corp
FCCO27.63-0.11
-0.38%
First Community Corp
MGRX2.21-0.01
-0.45%
Mangoceuticals Inc
MPLX50.51-0.30
-0.59%
Mplx LP

BBVXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBVXF and NAUBF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBVXF and NAUBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBVXF
1D Price
Change %
BBVXF100%
+1.45%
NAUBF - BBVXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.52%
BCLYF - BBVXF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
AGRPF - BBVXF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACGBY - BBVXF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
ABMRF - BBVXF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BCLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCLYF and MUFG have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCLYF and MUFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCLYF
1D Price
Change %
BCLYF100%
-1.49%
MUFG - BCLYF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
SMFG - BCLYF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
BCS - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
BACHF - BCLYF
8%
Poorly correlated
-5.55%
BBVXF - BCLYF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
More