BBUC
Price
$28.82
Change
+$0.10 (+0.35%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
2.03B
CNS
Price
$73.35
Change
+$0.11 (+0.15%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
3.74B
64 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBUC vs CNS

Header iconBBUC vs CNS Comparison
Open Charts BBUC vs CNSBanner chart's image
Brookfield Business
Price$28.82
Change+$0.10 (+0.35%)
Volume$61.67K
Capitalization2.03B
Cohen & Steers
Price$73.35
Change+$0.11 (+0.15%)
Volume$381.17K
Capitalization3.74B
BBUC vs CNS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BBUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBUC vs. CNS commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBUC is a Hold and CNS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BBUC: $28.82 vs. CNS: $73.35)
Brand notoriety: BBUC and CNS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBUC: 60% vs. CNS: 173%
Market capitalization -- BBUC: $2.03B vs. CNS: $3.74B
BBUC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.03B. CNS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $174.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBUC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCNS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BBUC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CNS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BBUC is a better buy in the long-term than CNS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBUC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBUC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CNS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BBUC is a better buy in the short-term than CNS.

Price Growth

BBUC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.00% price change this week, while CNS (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNS is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+3.70% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNS($3.74B) has a higher market cap than BBUC($2.03B). BBUC YTD gains are higher at: 19.332 vs. CNS (-18.687). BBUC has more cash in the bank: 613M vs. CNS (187M). CNS has less debt than BBUC: CNS (140M) vs BBUC (7.94B).
BBUCCNSBBUC / CNS
Capitalization2.03B3.74B54%
EBITDA120MN/A-
Gain YTD19.332-18.687-103%
P/E RatioN/A23.29-
Revenue8.24BN/A-
Total Cash613M187M328%
Total Debt7.94B140M5,671%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNS: Fundamental Ratings
CNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
69
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69
SMR RATING
1..100
29
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBUCCNS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WWSAX20.750.01
+0.05%
Keeley Small Cap Fund A
HDGCX33.02-0.04
-0.12%
Hartford Dividend and Growth C
NBGUX31.06-0.11
-0.35%
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Adv
LIESX20.95-0.08
-0.38%
Franklin International Equity IS
NWCAX60.49-0.35
-0.58%
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A

BBUC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBUC has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBUC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBUC
1D Price
Change %
BBUC100%
+0.35%
BN - BBUC
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
PFG - BBUC
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
BLK - BBUC
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
TROW - BBUC
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
STT - BBUC
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
More

CNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNS has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNS jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNS
1D Price
Change %
CNS100%
+1.01%
APAM - CNS
75%
Closely correlated
+1.24%
BX - CNS
70%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
TROW - CNS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
BN - CNS
67%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
PFG - CNS
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More