It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BBU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileESAB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BBU’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESAB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
BBU (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а -4.81% price change this week, while ESAB (@Metal Fabrication) price change was -2.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.57%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.17%.
BBU is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.
ESAB is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
@Metal Fabrication (-0.38% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
BBU | ESAB | BBU / ESAB | |
Capitalization | 2.37B | 6.92B | 34% |
EBITDA | N/A | 507M | - |
Gain YTD | 14.670 | -4.759 | -308% |
P/E Ratio | 2.69 | 24.96 | 11% |
Revenue | N/A | 2.74B | - |
Total Cash | 2.2B | 258M | 852% |
Total Debt | 44.4B | 1.17B | 3,805% |
BBU | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BBU | ESAB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago44% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago59% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago69% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago74% | 23 days ago72% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago73% | 1 day ago61% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago67% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FFALX | 16.86 | 0.07 | +0.42% |
Franklin Global Allocation A | |||
BRSJX | 15.41 | 0.04 | +0.26% |
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq I | |||
JHQAX | 34.02 | 0.06 | +0.18% |
JPMorgan Hedged Equity A | |||
GLNKX | 23.51 | 0.03 | +0.13% |
MFS Global New Discovery R2 | |||
NEAIX | 56.77 | -0.03 | -0.05% |
Needham Aggressive Growth Institutional |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBU has been loosely correlated with MMM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBU jumps, then MMM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBU | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BBU | 100% | -2.24% | ||
MMM - BBU | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
HON - BBU | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
PRLB - BBU | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
TTI - BBU | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
ESAB - BBU | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESAB has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESAB jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESAB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ESAB | 100% | -0.71% | ||
MLI - ESAB | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
NWPX - ESAB | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
CRS - ESAB | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
GFF - ESAB | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
CODI - ESAB | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
More |