BBT
Price
$26.83
Change
+$0.33 (+1.25%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.23B
40 days until earnings call
SFNC
Price
$20.88
Change
-$0.28 (-1.32%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.02B
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBT vs SFNC

Header iconBBT vs SFNC Comparison
Open Charts BBT vs SFNCBanner chart's image
Beacon Financial
Price$26.83
Change+$0.33 (+1.25%)
Volume$1.88M
Capitalization2.23B
Simmons First National
Price$20.88
Change-$0.28 (-1.32%)
Volume$516.18K
Capitalization3.02B
BBT vs SFNC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBT vs. SFNC commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBT is a Hold and SFNC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BBT: $26.83 vs. SFNC: $20.88)
Brand notoriety: BBT and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBT: 328% vs. SFNC: 38%
Market capitalization -- BBT: $2.23B vs. SFNC: $3.02B
BBT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.23B. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BBT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFNC is a better buy in the long-term than BBT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BBT and SFNC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BBT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.68% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

BBT is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFNC($3.02B) has a higher market cap than BBT($2.23B). SFNC has higher P/E ratio than BBT: SFNC (16.44) vs BBT (10.35). SFNC YTD gains are higher at: -3.784 vs. BBT (-5.628).
BBTSFNCBBT / SFNC
Capitalization2.23B3.02B74%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.628-3.784149%
P/E Ratio10.3516.4463%
RevenueN/A795M-
Total CashN/A423M-
Total DebtN/A1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBT vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
BBT
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
715
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10072
SMR RATING
1..100
10015
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5059
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BBT's Valuation (40) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (59). This means that BBT’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BBT (100). This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to BBT’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's SMR Rating (15) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BBT (100). This means that SFNC’s stock grew significantly faster than BBT’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BBT (53). This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to BBT’s over the last 12 months.

BBT's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (59). This means that BBT’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBTSFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IJSSX14.340.06
+0.42%
VY® JPMorgan Small Cap Core Equity S
MWOJX65.410.06
+0.09%
MFS Global Growth R4
PWDAX10.43N/A
N/A
Donoghue Forlines Dividend A
FOKFX28.81N/A
N/A
Fidelity OTC K6
FRGSX121.38-0.42
-0.34%
Franklin Growth C

BBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBT has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBT jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBT
1D Price
Change %
BBT100%
+1.25%
UBSI - BBT
91%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
FCF - BBT
91%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
FULT - BBT
90%
Closely correlated
-1.72%
PFS - BBT
90%
Closely correlated
-0.60%
STBA - BBT
90%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
More

SFNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFNC has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFNC jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFNC
1D Price
Change %
SFNC100%
-1.32%
UCB - SFNC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
UBSI - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
BBT - SFNC
89%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
HWC - SFNC
88%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
HOPE - SFNC
88%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
More