Ad is loading...
BBSC vs VTWO
BBSC vs VTWO Comparison
Open Charts BBSC vs VTWO
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Sml Cp Eq ETF
Price$63.90
Change+$0.46 (+0.73%)
Volume$857
Net Assets539.89M
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Price$83.59
Change-$0.73 (-0.87%)
Volume$994.37K
Net Assets11.65B
BBSC vs VTWO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBSC vs. VTWO commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBSC is a Buy and VTWO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTWO has more net assets: 11.6B vs. BBSC (540M). BBSC has a higher annual dividend yield than VTWO: BBSC (-6.023) vs VTWO (-6.358). BBSC was incepted earlier than VTWO: BBSC (4 years) vs VTWO (15 years). VTWO (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than BBSC (0.09). BBSC has a higher turnover VTWO (12.00) vs VTWO (12.00).
| BBSC | VTWO | BBSC / VTWO | |
| Gain YTD | -6.023 | -6.358 | 95% |
| Net Assets | 540M | 11.6B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.07 | 129% |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 12.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 1.43 | 1.47 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBSC | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | 10 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BBSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBSC has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBSC jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBSC | 100% | N/A | ||
| BCC - BBSC | 69% Closely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| AFRM - BBSC | 63% Loosely correlated | +4.84% | ||
| W - BBSC | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| SPXC - BBSC | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| CVNA - BBSC | 52% Loosely correlated | +4.25% | ||
More | ||||
VTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VTWO has been loosely correlated with SSD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VTWO jumps, then SSD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTWO | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| SSD - VTWO | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| LNW - VTWO | 49% Loosely correlated | -5.04% | ||
| FIX - VTWO | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| ONTO - VTWO | 38% Loosely correlated | +4.93% | ||
| FN - VTWO | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||