Ad is loading...
BBSC vs SMMD
BBSC vs SMMD Comparison
Open Charts BBSC vs SMMD
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Sml Cp Eq ETF
Price$63.90
Change+$0.46 (+0.73%)
Volume$857
Net Assets539.89M
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$65.68
Change-$0.32 (-0.48%)
Volume$115.52K
Net Assets1.47B
BBSC vs SMMD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBSC vs. SMMD commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBSC is a Buy and SMMD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMD has more net assets: 1.47B vs. BBSC (540M). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than BBSC: SMMD (-3.122) vs BBSC (-6.023). BBSC was incepted earlier than SMMD: BBSC (4 years) vs SMMD (8 years). BBSC (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than SMMD (0.15). BBSC has a higher turnover SMMD (9.00) vs SMMD (9.00).
| BBSC | SMMD | BBSC / SMMD | |
| Gain YTD | -6.023 | -3.122 | 193% |
| Net Assets | 540M | 1.47B | 37% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.15 | 60% |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 9.00 | 222% |
| Yield | 1.43 | 1.45 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBSC | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | 10 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BBSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBSC has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBSC jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBSC | 100% | N/A | ||
| BCC - BBSC | 69% Closely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| AFRM - BBSC | 63% Loosely correlated | +4.84% | ||
| W - BBSC | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| SPXC - BBSC | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| CVNA - BBSC | 52% Loosely correlated | +4.25% | ||
More | ||||
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.12% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.47% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||