Ad is loading...
BBSC vs SMMD
BBSC vs SMMD Comparison
Open Charts BBSC vs SMMD
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Sml Cp Eq ETF
Price$66.61
Change-$2.04 (-2.97%)
Volume$4.69K
Net Assets511.41M
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$67.59
Change-$1.98 (-2.85%)
Volume$71.46K
Net Assets1.42B
BBSC vs SMMD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBSC vs. SMMD commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBSC is a Hold and SMMD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMD has more net assets: 1.42B vs. BBSC (511M). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than BBSC: SMMD (3.838) vs BBSC (2.228). BBSC was incepted earlier than SMMD: BBSC (4 years) vs SMMD (8 years). BBSC has a higher turnover SMMD (11.00) vs SMMD (11.00).
| BBSC | SMMD | BBSC / SMMD | |
| Gain YTD | 2.228 | 3.838 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 511M | 1.42B | 36% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 41.00 | 11.00 | 373% |
| Yield | 1.61 | 1.32 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBSC | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 82% | 17 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BBSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBSC has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBSC jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBSC | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| BCC - BBSC | 69% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| AFRM - BBSC | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| W - BBSC | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| SPXC - BBSC | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| CVNA - BBSC | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
More | ||||
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | +0.67% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.87% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
More | ||||