Ad is loading...
BBSC vs SCHA
BBSC vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts BBSC vs SCHA
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Sml Cp Eq ETF
Price$56.27
Change+$0.37 (+0.66%)
Volume$17.17K
Net Assets463.08M
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$21.83
Change+$0.17 (+0.78%)
Volume$2.94M
Net Assets15.03B
BBSC vs SCHA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBSC vs. SCHA commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBSC is a Buy and SCHA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 15B vs. BBSC (463M). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than BBSC: SCHA (-15.392) vs BBSC (-17.242). BBSC was incepted earlier than SCHA: BBSC (4 years) vs SCHA (15 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than BBSC (0.09). BBSC has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| BBSC | SCHA | BBSC / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | -17.242 | -15.392 | 112% |
| Net Assets | 463M | 15B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.04 | 225% |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 11.00 | 182% |
| Yield | 1.39 | 1.67 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBSC | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BBSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBSC has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBSC jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBSC | 100% | +0.67% | ||
| BCC - BBSC | 69% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| AFRM - BBSC | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.29% | ||
| W - BBSC | 57% Loosely correlated | +5.85% | ||
| SPXC - BBSC | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| CVNA - BBSC | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +0.78% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.97% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.86% | ||
More | ||||