Ad is loading...
BBSC vs SCHA
BBSC vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts BBSC vs SCHA
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Sml Cp Eq ETF
Price$66.61
Change-$2.04 (-2.97%)
Volume$4.69K
Net Assets511.41M
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$25.61
Change-$0.72 (-2.73%)
Volume$2.24M
Net Assets18.47B
BBSC vs SCHA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBSC vs. SCHA commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBSC is a Hold and SCHA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 18.5B vs. BBSC (511M). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than BBSC: SCHA (3.596) vs BBSC (2.228). BBSC was incepted earlier than SCHA: BBSC (4 years) vs SCHA (15 years). BBSC has a higher turnover SCHA (9.00) vs SCHA (9.00).
| BBSC | SCHA | BBSC / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | 2.228 | 3.596 | 62% |
| Net Assets | 511M | 18.5B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 41.00 | 9.00 | 456% |
| Yield | 1.61 | 1.31 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBSC | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 82% | 19 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 82% | 17 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BBSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBSC has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBSC jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBSC | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| BCC - BBSC | 69% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| AFRM - BBSC | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| W - BBSC | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| SPXC - BBSC | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| CVNA - BBSC | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +0.71% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.31% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +3.37% | ||
More | ||||