Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BBMC vs XMHQ
BBMC vs XMHQ Comparison
Open Charts BBMC vs XMHQ
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Mid Cap Eq ETF
Price$108.65
Change-$0.29 (-0.27%)
Volume$2.02K
Net Assets2.03B
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Price$104.70
Change-$0.08 (-0.08%)
Volume$1.76K
Net Assets5.17B
BBMC vs XMHQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBMC vs. XMHQ commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBMC is a Hold and XMHQ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XMHQ has more net assets: 5.17B vs. BBMC (2.03B). BBMC has a higher annual dividend yield than XMHQ: BBMC (14.166) vs XMHQ (6.921). BBMC was incepted earlier than XMHQ: BBMC (6 years) vs XMHQ (19 years). BBMC (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than XMHQ (0.25). XMHQ has a higher turnover BBMC (13.00) vs BBMC (13.00).
| BBMC | XMHQ | BBMC / XMHQ | |
| Gain YTD | 14.166 | 6.921 | 205% |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 5.17B | 39% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.25 | 28% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 58.00 | 22% |
| Yield | 1.28 | 0.64 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBMC | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 79% | 10 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BBMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBMC has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBMC jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBMC | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| BLDR - BBMC | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| CSL - BBMC | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| RS - BBMC | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| DKNG - BBMC | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| AXON - BBMC | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||
XMHQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMHQ has been closely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMHQ jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMHQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMHQ | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| SEIC - XMHQ | 79% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| AIT - XMHQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| VNT - XMHQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| GGG - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| OC - XMHQ | 76% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||