Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BBMC vs XMHQ
BBMC vs XMHQ Comparison
Open Charts BBMC vs XMHQ
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Mid Cap Eq ETF
Price$112.54
Change+$7.77 (+7.42%)
Volume$25.27K
Net Assets1.93B
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Price$106.42
Change+$2.10 (+2.01%)
Volume$479.19K
Net Assets5.28B
BBMC vs XMHQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBMC vs. XMHQ commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBMC is a Hold and XMHQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XMHQ has more net assets: 5.29B vs. BBMC (1.93B). BBMC has a higher annual dividend yield than XMHQ: BBMC (5.554) vs XMHQ (3.905). BBMC was incepted earlier than XMHQ: BBMC (6 years) vs XMHQ (19 years). BBMC (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than XMHQ (0.25).
| BBMC | XMHQ | BBMC / XMHQ | |
| Gain YTD | 5.554 | 3.905 | 142% |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 5.29B | 36% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.25 | 28% |
| Turnover | N/A | 58.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.19 | 0.62 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBMC | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 14 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BBMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBMC has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBMC jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBMC | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| BLDR - BBMC | 62% Loosely correlated | +4.67% | ||
| CSL - BBMC | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.60% | ||
| RS - BBMC | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| DKNG - BBMC | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.41% | ||
| AXON - BBMC | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.89% | ||
More | ||||
XMHQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMHQ has been closely correlated with AIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMHQ jumps, then AIT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMHQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMHQ | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| AIT - XMHQ | 80% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| SEIC - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | -5.14% | ||
| GGG - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| VNT - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| DCI - XMHQ | 77% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
More | ||||