Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BBGSX vs FSMAX
BBGSX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BBGSX vs FSMAX
Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth
Price$16.75
Change-$1.01 (-5.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.72B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.54
Change+$1.43 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.63B
BBGSX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBGSX vs. FSMAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBGSX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.6B vs. BBGSX (9.72B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BBGSX: FSMAX (0.56) vs BBGSX (0.12). BBGSX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BBGSX (11 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). BBGSX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). BBGSX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. BBGSX (0.49). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.23 vs. BBGSX (-5.34).
| BBGSX | FSMAX | BBGSX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.04 | 971% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.04 | 1,886% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.824 | 3.050 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.72B | 40.6B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.56 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.49 | 10.51 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.24 | 48.06 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.34 | 19.23 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.33 | 157.02 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers