BBEM | EEM | BBEM / EEM | |
Gain YTD | 25.694 | 27.502 | 93% |
Net Assets | 773M | 20.2B | 4% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.72 | 21% |
Turnover | 14.00 | 13.00 | 108% |
Yield | 2.58 | 2.37 | 109% |
Fund Existence | 2 years | 22 years | - |
BBEM | EEM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BBEM and VIPS have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBEM and VIPS's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BBEM | 100% | -0.49% | ||
VIPS - BBEM | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
ZK - BBEM | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
TAL - BBEM | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
ATAT - BBEM | 7% Poorly correlated | -3.17% | ||
GFI - BBEM | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.33% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EEM | 100% | -0.58% | ||
BZ - EEM | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
ATHM - EEM | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
PDD - EEM | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
HTHT - EEM | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
IQ - EEM | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More |