Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BBCA vs EWS
BBCA vs EWS Comparison
Open Charts BBCA vs EWS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
Price$80.12
Change-$0.20 (-0.25%)
Volume$179.71K
Net Assets8.32B
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
Price$25.74
Change-$0.16 (-0.62%)
Volume$221.04K
Net Assets740.63M
BBCA vs EWS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBCA vs. EWS commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBCA is a Hold and EWS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBCA has more net assets: 8.32B vs. EWS (741M). EWS has a higher annual dividend yield than BBCA: EWS (17.803) vs BBCA (13.836). BBCA was incepted earlier than EWS: BBCA (7 years) vs EWS (29 years). BBCA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EWS (0.50). EWS has a higher turnover BBCA (3.00) vs BBCA (3.00).
| BBCA | EWS | BBCA / EWS | |
| Gain YTD | 13.836 | 17.803 | 78% |
| Net Assets | 8.32B | 741M | 1,122% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.50 | 38% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 26.00 | 12% |
| Yield | 2.09 | 3.64 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 29 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBCA | EWS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 18 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BBCA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBCA has been closely correlated with RY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBCA jumps, then RY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBCA | 100% | -0.25% | ||
| RY - BBCA | 82% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| BMO - BBCA | 79% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| BN - BBCA | 79% Closely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| BNS - BBCA | 78% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CM - BBCA | 73% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
More | ||||
EWS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWS has been loosely correlated with GRAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWS jumps, then GRAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWS | 100% | -0.62% | ||
| GRAB - EWS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| SE - EWS | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.16% |