Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BBCA vs EWL
BBCA vs EWL Comparison
Open Charts BBCA vs EWL
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
Price$93.97
Change-$0.53 (-0.56%)
Volume$735
Net Assets9.77B
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
Price$62.39
Change+$0.50 (+0.81%)
Volume$200
Net Assets1.66B
BBCA vs EWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBCA vs. EWL commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBCA is a Hold and EWL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBCA has more net assets: 9.78B vs. EWL (1.66B). EWL has a higher annual dividend yield than BBCA: EWL (3.219) vs BBCA (1.613). BBCA was incepted earlier than EWL: BBCA (8 years) vs EWL (30 years). BBCA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EWL (0.50). EWL has a higher turnover BBCA (3.00) vs BBCA (3.00).
| BBCA | EWL | BBCA / EWL | |
| Gain YTD | 1.613 | 3.219 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 9.78B | 1.66B | 588% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.50 | 38% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 9.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 1.82 | 1.66 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 30 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBCA | EWL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 9 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 79% | 16 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BBCA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBCA has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBCA jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBCA | 100% | +0.55% | ||
| BN - BBCA | 79% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| MFC - BBCA | 78% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| RY - BBCA | 77% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| BAM - BBCA | 69% Closely correlated | -6.68% | ||
| BMO - BBCA | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.03% | ||
More | ||||
EWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWL has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWL jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWL | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| ALC - EWL | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.58% | ||
| BAER - EWL | 23% Poorly correlated | +5.28% | ||
| CFR - EWL | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
| ROG - EWL | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.55% | ||
| LOGN - EWL | -6% Poorly correlated | N/A |