Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BBCA vs EDEN
BBCA vs EDEN Comparison
Open Charts BBCA vs EDEN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
Price$87.19
Change-$1.70 (-1.91%)
Volume$5.56K
Net Assets9.01B
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
Price$110.54
Change-$1.21 (-1.08%)
Volume$3.4K
Net Assets195.33M
BBCA vs EDEN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBCA vs. EDEN commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBCA is a Buy and EDEN is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBCA has more net assets: 9.01B vs. EDEN (195M). BBCA has a higher annual dividend yield than EDEN: BBCA (27.614) vs EDEN (6.492). BBCA was incepted earlier than EDEN: BBCA (7 years) vs EDEN (14 years). BBCA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EDEN (0.53). EDEN has a higher turnover BBCA (3.00) vs BBCA (3.00).
| BBCA | EDEN | BBCA / EDEN | |
| Gain YTD | 27.614 | 6.492 | 425% |
| Net Assets | 9.01B | 195M | 4,622% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.53 | 36% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 14.00 | 21% |
| Yield | 1.90 | 1.84 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBCA | EDEN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 79% | 8 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BBCA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBCA has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBCA jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBCA | 100% | +1.35% | ||
| BN - BBCA | 79% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| MFC - BBCA | 79% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| RY - BBCA | 77% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| BAM - BBCA | 68% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| CM - BBCA | 67% Closely correlated | +1.52% | ||
More | ||||
EDEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDEN has been loosely correlated with GMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDEN jumps, then GMAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDEN | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| GMAB - EDEN | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| TOP - EDEN | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.36% | ||
| SIM - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | -3.96% | ||
| CHR - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.55% | ||
| FLS - EDEN | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
More | ||||