Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BBCA vs EDEN
BBCA vs EDEN Comparison
Open Charts BBCA vs EDEN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
Price$95.15
Change+$0.30 (+0.32%)
Volume$4.19K
Net Assets9.7B
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
Price$119.80
Change-$2.08 (-1.71%)
Volume$123
Net Assets217.54M
BBCA vs EDEN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBCA vs. EDEN commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBCA is a Hold and EDEN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBCA has more net assets: 9.7B vs. EDEN (218M). EDEN has a higher annual dividend yield than BBCA: EDEN (6.473) vs BBCA (1.989). BBCA was incepted earlier than EDEN: BBCA (7 years) vs EDEN (14 years). BBCA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EDEN (0.53). EDEN has a higher turnover BBCA (3.00) vs BBCA (3.00).
| BBCA | EDEN | BBCA / EDEN | |
| Gain YTD | 1.989 | 6.473 | 31% |
| Net Assets | 9.7B | 218M | 4,448% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.53 | 36% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 24.00 | 13% |
| Yield | 1.83 | 2.79 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBCA | EDEN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 14 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 14 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 79% | 16 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BBCA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBCA has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBCA jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBCA | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| BN - BBCA | 79% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| MFC - BBCA | 79% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| RY - BBCA | 77% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| BAM - BBCA | 70% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| CM - BBCA | 67% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
More | ||||
EDEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDEN has been loosely correlated with GMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDEN jumps, then GMAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDEN | 100% | +0.80% | ||
| GMAB - EDEN | 56% Loosely correlated | +4.34% | ||
| TOP - EDEN | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.98% | ||
| STG - EDEN | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
| SIM - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.94% | ||
| CHR - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.56% | ||
More | ||||