Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BBCA vs EDEN
BBCA vs EDEN Comparison
Open Charts BBCA vs EDEN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
Price$85.61
Change+$0.18 (+0.21%)
Volume$170.16K
Net Assets8.79B
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
Price$108.91
Change-$0.65 (-0.59%)
Volume$7.79K
Net Assets186.68M
BBCA vs EDEN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBCA vs. EDEN commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBCA is a StrongBuy and EDEN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBCA has more net assets: 8.79B vs. EDEN (187M). BBCA has a higher annual dividend yield than EDEN: BBCA (22.295) vs EDEN (3.790). BBCA was incepted earlier than EDEN: BBCA (7 years) vs EDEN (14 years). BBCA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EDEN (0.53). EDEN has a higher turnover BBCA (3.00) vs BBCA (3.00).
| BBCA | EDEN | BBCA / EDEN | |
| Gain YTD | 22.295 | 3.790 | 588% |
| Net Assets | 8.79B | 187M | 4,698% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.53 | 36% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 14.00 | 21% |
| Yield | 1.94 | 1.82 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBCA | EDEN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BBCA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBCA has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBCA jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBCA | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| BN - BBCA | 81% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| MFC - BBCA | 78% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| RY - BBCA | 76% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| BMO - BBCA | 69% Closely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| BAM - BBCA | 68% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
More | ||||
EDEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EDEN and GMAB have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDEN and GMAB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDEN | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| GMAB - EDEN | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| STG - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
| TOP - EDEN | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
| FLS - EDEN | -8% Poorly correlated | +0.82% |