BBBXF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
LGCFF
Price
$1.67
Change
-$0.01 (-0.60%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

BBBXF vs LGCFF

Header iconBBBXF vs LGCFF Comparison
Open Charts BBBXF vs LGCFFBanner chart's image
Brixton Metals
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$434.9K
CapitalizationN/A
Lavras Gold
Price$1.67
Change-$0.01 (-0.60%)
Volume$44.92K
CapitalizationN/A
BBBXF vs LGCFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BBBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBBXF vs. LGCFF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBBXF is a Hold and LGCFF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BBBXF: $0.05 vs. LGCFF: $1.67)
Brand notoriety: BBBXF and LGCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBBXF: 94% vs. LGCFF: 548%
Market capitalization -- BBBXF: $61.79M vs. LGCFF: $7.75M
BBBXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $61.79M. LGCFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBBXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLGCFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BBBXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LGCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LGCFF is a better buy in the long-term than BBBXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBBXF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BBBXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BBBXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.02% price change this week, while LGCFF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.68% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBBXF($61.8M) has a higher market cap than LGCFF($7.75M). LGCFF YTD gains are higher at: 130.313 vs. BBBXF (-57.143). LGCFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.44M vs. BBBXF (-15.39M). BBBXF has more cash in the bank: 15.8M vs. LGCFF (2.95M). BBBXF has less debt than LGCFF: BBBXF (113K) vs LGCFF (280K). BBBXF (0) and LGCFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BBBXFLGCFFBBBXF / LGCFF
Capitalization61.8M7.75M797%
EBITDA-15.39M-2.44M630%
Gain YTD-57.143130.313-44%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash15.8M2.95M536%
Total Debt113K280K40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBBXF: Fundamental Ratings
BBBXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBBXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BBBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

BBBXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBBXF and OCGSF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBBXF and OCGSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBBXF
1D Price
Change %
BBBXF100%
-5.74%
OCGSF - BBBXF
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
ASM - BBBXF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.89%
SASKF - BBBXF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.06%
FFMGF - BBBXF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
NG - BBBXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
More

LGCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGCFF and FPVTF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGCFF and FPVTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGCFF
1D Price
Change %
LGCFF100%
-0.60%
FPVTF - LGCFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBBXF - LGCFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.74%
SDRC - LGCFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
PHNMF - LGCFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.05%
TSGZF - LGCFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-14.67%
More