BBBXF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
61.79M
FFMGF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
103.03M
Ad is loading...

BBBXF vs FFMGF

Header iconBBBXF vs FFMGF Comparison
Open Charts BBBXF vs FFMGFBanner chart's image
Brixton Metals
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$218.92K
Capitalization61.79M
First Mining Gold
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$838.75K
Capitalization103.03M
BBBXF vs FFMGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BBBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBBXF vs. FFMGF commentary
Apr 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBBXF is a Hold and FFMGF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2025
Stock price -- (BBBXF: $0.05 vs. FFMGF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: BBBXF and FFMGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBBXF: 94% vs. FFMGF: 119%
Market capitalization -- BBBXF: $61.79M vs. FFMGF: $103.03M
BBBXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $61.79M. FFMGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $103.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBBXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFFMGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BBBXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FFMGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFMGF is a better buy in the long-term than BBBXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBBXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFMGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBBXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FFMGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BBBXF and FFMGF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BBBXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +6.16% price change this week, while FFMGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +14.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +8.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+8.01% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMGF($103M) has a higher market cap than BBBXF($61.8M). FFMGF YTD gains are higher at: 31.422 vs. BBBXF (7.889). FFMGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -7.24M vs. BBBXF (-15.39M). BBBXF has more cash in the bank: 15.8M vs. FFMGF (14.5M). BBBXF has less debt than FFMGF: BBBXF (113K) vs FFMGF (281K). BBBXF (0) and FFMGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BBBXFFFMGFBBBXF / FFMGF
Capitalization61.8M103M60%
EBITDA-15.39M-7.24M213%
Gain YTD7.88931.42225%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash15.8M14.5M109%
Total Debt113K281K40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBBXF vs FFMGF: Fundamental Ratings
BBBXF
FFMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5034
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9894
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFMGF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as BBBXF (44). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to BBBXF’s over the last 12 months.

FFMGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BBBXF (100). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to BBBXF’s over the last 12 months.

FFMGF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as BBBXF (98). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to BBBXF’s over the last 12 months.

FFMGF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BBBXF (61). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to BBBXF’s over the last 12 months.

FFMGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BBBXF (100). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to BBBXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBBXFFFMGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BBBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

BBBXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBBXF and OCGSF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBBXF and OCGSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBBXF
1D Price
Change %
BBBXF100%
-2.31%
OCGSF - BBBXF
33%
Poorly correlated
-6.95%
ASM - BBBXF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
SASKF - BBBXF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
FFMGF - BBBXF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
NG - BBBXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
More

FFMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFMGF has been loosely correlated with SLVRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFMGF jumps, then SLVRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFMGF
1D Price
Change %
FFMGF100%
+2.61%
SLVRF - FFMGF
36%
Loosely correlated
-6.74%
CXBMF - FFMGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
ISVLF - FFMGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.84%
SSVRF - FFMGF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
BKRRF - FFMGF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.66%
More