BBBK
Price
$40.00
Change
-$0.78 (-1.91%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
70.2M
BEOB
Price
$82.89
Change
+$1.38 (+1.69%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
8.37M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBBK vs BEOB

Header iconBBBK vs BEOB Comparison
Open Charts BBBK vs BEOBBanner chart's image
Baker Boyer Ban
Price$40.00
Change-$0.78 (-1.91%)
Volume$14.21K
Capitalization70.2M
BEO Ban
Price$82.89
Change+$1.38 (+1.69%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.37M
BBBK vs BEOB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BBBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BEOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBBK vs. BEOB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBBK is a Hold and BEOB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BBBK: $40.00 vs. BEOB: $82.89)
Brand notoriety: BBBK and BEOB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBBK: 839% vs. BEOB: 17%
Market capitalization -- BBBK: $70.2M vs. BEOB: $8.37M
BBBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $70.2M. BEOB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $8.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBBK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBEOB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BBBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BEOB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BEOB is a better buy in the long-term than BBBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBBK’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BEOB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBBK’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BEOB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BEOB is a better buy in the short-term than BBBK.

Price Growth

BBBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.91% price change this week, while BEOB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBBK($70.2M) has a higher market cap than BEOB($8.37M). BBBK YTD gains are higher at: 19.342 vs. BEOB (7.712).
BBBKBEOBBBBK / BEOB
Capitalization70.2M8.37M839%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.3427.712251%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue22.7MN/A-
Total Cash4.63MN/A-
Total Debt2MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBBK vs BEOB: Fundamental Ratings
BBBK
BEOB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1002
SMR RATING
1..100
7329
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5354
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1464
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a7

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BBBK's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as BEOB (63). This means that BBBK’s stock grew similarly to BEOB’s over the last 12 months.

BEOB's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BBBK (100). This means that BEOB’s stock grew significantly faster than BBBK’s over the last 12 months.

BEOB's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBBK (73). This means that BEOB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBBK’s over the last 12 months.

BBBK's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as BEOB (54). This means that BBBK’s stock grew similarly to BEOB’s over the last 12 months.

BBBK's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEOB (64). This means that BBBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEOB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBBKBEOB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
21%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BEOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DUFRY5.510.02
+0.27%
AVOLTA AG
BYDDF15.630.03
+0.20%
BYD Co Ltd
ECTXF6.86N/A
N/A
ELECTROLUX PROFESSIONAL AB
XXMMF0.09N/A
N/A
XIMEN MINING CORP
AHAHF3.20N/A
N/A
DESIGN MILK CO LTD.

BBBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBBK and USMT have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBBK and USMT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBBK
1D Price
Change %
BBBK100%
N/A
USMT - BBBK
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDOUY - BBBK
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
BEOB - BBBK
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBAJF - BBBK
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDORY - BBBK
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
More

BEOB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BEOB has been loosely correlated with SUGBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BEOB jumps, then SUGBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BEOB
1D Price
Change %
BEOB100%
N/A
SUGBY - BEOB
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMGGF - BEOB
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPFOF - BEOB
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPCB - BEOB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EXSR - BEOB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More