BBAJF
Price
$2.50
Change
+$0.27 (+12.11%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.96B
LRCDF
Price
$24.13
Change
-$0.25 (-1.03%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.05B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBAJF vs LRCDF

Header iconBBAJF vs LRCDF Comparison
Open Charts BBAJF vs LRCDFBanner chart's image
Banco Del Bajio
Price$2.50
Change+$0.27 (+12.11%)
Volume$13.75K
Capitalization2.96B
Laurentian Bank of Canada
Price$24.13
Change-$0.25 (-1.03%)
Volume$62.55K
Capitalization1.05B
BBAJF vs LRCDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BBAJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBAJF vs. LRCDF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBAJF is a Buy and LRCDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BBAJF: $2.50 vs. LRCDF: $24.13)
Brand notoriety: BBAJF and LRCDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBAJF: 253% vs. LRCDF: 557%
Market capitalization -- BBAJF: $2.96B vs. LRCDF: $1.05B
BBAJF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.96B. LRCDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBAJF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLRCDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BBAJF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LRCDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BBAJF is a better buy in the long-term than LRCDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBAJF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRCDF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBAJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LRCDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LRCDF is a better buy in the short-term than BBAJF.

Price Growth

BBAJF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +11.86% price change this week, while LRCDF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBAJF($2.96B) has a higher market cap than LRCDF($1.05B). LRCDF has higher P/E ratio than BBAJF: LRCDF (11.00) vs BBAJF (5.64). BBAJF YTD gains are higher at: 28.205 vs. LRCDF (20.831). LRCDF has less debt than BBAJF: LRCDF (15.6B) vs BBAJF (48.4B). BBAJF has higher revenues than LRCDF: BBAJF (26.8B) vs LRCDF (975M).
BBAJFLRCDFBBAJF / LRCDF
Capitalization2.96B1.05B283%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.20520.831135%
P/E Ratio5.6411.0051%
Revenue26.8B975M2,749%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt48.4B15.6B310%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBAJF vs LRCDF: Fundamental Ratings
BBAJF
LRCDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4828
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5286
SMR RATING
1..100
314
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3340
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2243

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BBAJF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (15). This means that BBAJF’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

BBAJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LRCDF (86). This means that BBAJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

BBAJF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (14). This means that BBAJF’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

LRCDF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BBAJF (49). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to BBAJF’s over the last 12 months.

BBAJF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (40). This means that BBAJF’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBAJFLRCDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBAJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ANORX19.990.26
+1.32%
American Century Small Cap Growth R
RGOIX23.720.23
+0.98%
RBC Global Opportunities I
FMGIX16.590.13
+0.79%
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Instl
AWAAX24.480.10
+0.41%
AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy A
FBONX38.510.11
+0.29%
American Funds American Balanced 529-F-3

BBAJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBAJF and SOME have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBAJF and SOME's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBAJF
1D Price
Change %
BBAJF100%
N/A
SOME - BBAJF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
KNFSF - BBAJF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSBH - BBAJF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LRCDF - BBAJF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDOUY - BBAJF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
More