BBAJF
Price
$2.41
Change
-$0.16 (-6.23%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.62B
LRCDF
Price
$23.60
Change
+$0.87 (+3.83%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBAJF vs LRCDF

Header iconBBAJF vs LRCDF Comparison
Open Charts BBAJF vs LRCDFBanner chart's image
Banco Del Bajio
Price$2.41
Change-$0.16 (-6.23%)
Volume$2.96K
Capitalization3.62B
Laurentian Bank of Canada
Price$23.60
Change+$0.87 (+3.83%)
Volume$122
Capitalization1.3B
BBAJF vs LRCDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BBAJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBAJF vs. LRCDF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBAJF is a Hold and LRCDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BBAJF: $2.41 vs. LRCDF: $23.60)
Brand notoriety: BBAJF and LRCDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBAJF: 65% vs. LRCDF: 4%
Market capitalization -- BBAJF: $3.62B vs. LRCDF: $1.3B
BBAJF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.62B. LRCDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBAJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLRCDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BBAJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LRCDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LRCDF is a better buy in the long-term than BBAJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBAJF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRCDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBAJF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LRCDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LRCDF is a better buy in the short-term than BBAJF.

Price Growth

BBAJF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LRCDF (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBAJF($3.62B) has a higher market cap than LRCDF($1.3B). BBAJF (8.56) and LRCDF (8.54) have similar P/E ratio . BBAJF YTD gains are higher at: 23.718 vs. LRCDF (18.177). LRCDF has less debt than BBAJF: LRCDF (15.4B) vs BBAJF (44.9B). BBAJF has higher revenues than LRCDF: BBAJF (17.2B) vs LRCDF (1.03B).
BBAJFLRCDFBBAJF / LRCDF
Capitalization3.62B1.3B278%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.71818.177130%
P/E Ratio8.568.54100%
Revenue17.2B1.03B1,663%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt44.9B15.4B292%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBAJF vs LRCDF: Fundamental Ratings
BBAJF
LRCDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5191
SMR RATING
1..100
312
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7953
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LRCDF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as BBAJF (38). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to BBAJF’s over the last 12 months.

BBAJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LRCDF (91). This means that BBAJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

BBAJF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (12). This means that BBAJF’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

LRCDF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BBAJF (61). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to BBAJF’s over the last 12 months.

LRCDF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as BBAJF (79). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to BBAJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBAJFLRCDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBAJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCTR34.080.40
+1.20%
First Trust Lunt US Factor Rotation ETF
BGIG30.720.19
+0.62%
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF
QCJA20.700.08
+0.36%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Jan
GEM37.580.13
+0.35%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® EMkts Eq ETF
LNGZ27.83N/A
N/A
Range Global LNG Ecosystem Index ETF

BBAJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBAJF and SOME have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBAJF and SOME's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBAJF
1D Price
Change %
BBAJF100%
N/A
SOME - BBAJF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNFSF - BBAJF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSBH - BBAJF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LRCDF - BBAJF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDOUY - BBAJF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
More

LRCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LRCDF and KBCSY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LRCDF and KBCSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRCDF
1D Price
Change %
LRCDF100%
N/A
KBCSY - LRCDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
BBAJF - LRCDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPXXF - LRCDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPXXY - LRCDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNBBY - LRCDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
More