BAYAU
Price
$11.14
Change
+$0.14 (+1.27%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
IROHU
Price
$10.84
Change
-$0.36 (-3.21%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAYAU vs IROHU

Header iconBAYAU vs IROHU Comparison
Open Charts BAYAU vs IROHUBanner chart's image
Bayview Acquisition
Price$11.14
Change+$0.14 (+1.27%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Iron Horse Acquisitions
Price$10.84
Change-$0.36 (-3.21%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
BAYAU vs IROHU Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAYAU vs. IROHU commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAYAU is a StrongBuy and IROHU is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BAYAU: $11.14 vs. IROHU: $10.84)
Brand notoriety: BAYAU and IROHU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAYAU: 75% vs. IROHU: 86%
Market capitalization -- BAYAU: $0 vs. IROHU: $0
BAYAU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. IROHU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAYAU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIROHU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAYAU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IROHU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BAYAU and IROHU are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

BAYAU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IROHU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.17% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IROHU YTD gains are higher at: 2.457 vs. BAYAU (2.108).
BAYAUIROHUBAYAU / IROHU
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.1082.45786%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCK5.31-0.03
-0.56%
PIMCO CALIFORNIA Municipal Income FUND II
FHEQ28.00-0.23
-0.81%
Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF
JTEK78.83-0.99
-1.24%
JPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETF
SQEW32.07-0.46
-1.41%
LeaderShares® Equity Skew ETF
BTC46.61-0.69
-1.46%
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF

BAYAU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BAYAU and NHIC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BAYAU and NHIC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAYAU
1D Price
Change %
BAYAU100%
N/A
NHIC - BAYAU
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
NETD - BAYAU
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
ANSC - BAYAU
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UMAC - BAYAU
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.55%
JVSAU - BAYAU
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IROHU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IROHU and KVACU have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IROHU and KVACU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IROHU
1D Price
Change %
IROHU100%
N/A
KVACU - IROHU
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AACT - IROHU
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
BAYAU - IROHU
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DYCQU - IROHU
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPKLU - IROHU
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More