Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAWAX vs RGAHX
BAWAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs RGAHX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Adv
Price$52.17
Change-$1.00 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.74B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$77.22
Change-$0.93 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
BAWAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. BAWAX (8.74B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BAWAX: RGAHX (0.50) vs BAWAX (0.00). BAWAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BAWAX (13 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). BAWAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). BAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: BAWAX (100) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.38 vs. BAWAX (1.99). BAWAX return over 5 years is better than : 76.73 vs. RGAHX (49.84).
| BAWAX | RGAHX | BAWAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.44 | 230% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.44 | 230% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.134 | 5.147 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.74B | 306B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.99 | 7.38 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.05 | 53.85 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.73 | 49.84 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 233.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement