Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAWAX vs RGAHX
BAWAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs RGAHX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Adv
Price$55.53
Change+$0.90 (+1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.14B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$81.72
Change+$0.80 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
BAWAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. BAWAX (9.14B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BAWAX: RGAHX (0.47) vs BAWAX (0.00). BAWAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BAWAX (13 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). BAWAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). BAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: BAWAX (100) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.98 vs. BAWAX (5.55). BAWAX return over 5 years is better than : 77.41 vs. RGAHX (50.13).
| BAWAX | RGAHX | BAWAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.44 | 230% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.44 | 230% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.583 | 11.275 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.14B | 323B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.55 | 10.98 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.42 | 60.14 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.41 | 50.13 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 256.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement