Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAWAX vs RGAGX
BAWAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs RGAGX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Adv
Price$54.70
Change+$0.29 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.3B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$87.43
Change-$0.84 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.37B
BAWAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. BAWAX (8.3B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than BAWAX: RGAGX (0.59) vs BAWAX (0.00). BAWAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: BAWAX (13 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). BAWAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). BAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: BAWAX (100) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.80 vs. BAWAX (1.88). BAWAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.41 vs. RGAGX (49.34).
| BAWAX | RGAGX | BAWAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.30 | 337% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.30 | 337% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.990 | 17.277 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.3B | 338B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.88 | 12.80 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.05 | 73.70 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.41 | 49.34 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 265.40 | 117.69 | 226% |