Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAWAX vs RGAGX
BAWAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs RGAGX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Adv
Price$54.87
Change-$0.24 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.66B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
BAWAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. BAWAX (8.66B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than BAWAX: RGAGX (0.60) vs BAWAX (0.00). BAWAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: BAWAX (13 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). BAWAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). BAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: BAWAX (100) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. BAWAX (5.95). BAWAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.78 vs. RGAGX (46.14).
| BAWAX | RGAGX | BAWAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.30 | 337% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.30 | 337% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.317 | 14.500 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.66B | 329B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.95 | 15.11 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.63 | 43.78 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.78 | 46.14 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 234.57 | 90.14 | 260% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement