Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAWAX vs GFAFX
BAWAX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs GFAFX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Adv
Price$55.09
Change+$0.58 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.17B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.09
Change+$1.11 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
BAWAX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. GFAFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. BAWAX (8.17B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than BAWAX: GFAFX (0.29) vs BAWAX (0.00). BAWAX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: BAWAX (13 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). BAWAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). BAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: BAWAX (100) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. BAWAX (0.70). BAWAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.16 vs. GFAFX (40.02).
| BAWAX | GFAFX | BAWAX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.67 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.67 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.626 | 17.923 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.17B | 337B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.70 | 11.53 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.41 | 72.21 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.16 | 40.02 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 236.07 | 100.61 | 235% |