Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAWAX vs CGFAX
BAWAX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs CGFAX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Adv
Price$54.70
Change+$0.29 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.3B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$85.93
Change+$0.34 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.66B
BAWAX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. CGFAX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a Buy and CGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. BAWAX (8.3B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BAWAX: CGFAX (0.32) vs BAWAX (0.00). BAWAX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BAWAX (13 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). BAWAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). BAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: BAWAX (100) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.26 vs. BAWAX (1.88). BAWAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.41 vs. CGFAX (47.81).
| BAWAX | CGFAX | BAWAX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.65 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.65 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.990 | 16.990 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.3B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.88 | 12.26 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.05 | 72.54 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.41 | 47.81 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 265.40 | 120.39 | 220% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement