Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAWAX vs CGFAX
BAWAX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs CGFAX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Adv
Price$54.87
Change-$0.24 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.66B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$83.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
BAWAX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. CGFAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a StrongBuy and CGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. BAWAX (8.66B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BAWAX: CGFAX (0.32) vs BAWAX (0.00). BAWAX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BAWAX (13 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). BAWAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). BAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: BAWAX (100) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. BAWAX (5.95). BAWAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.78 vs. CGFAX (44.65).
| BAWAX | CGFAX | BAWAX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.65 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.65 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.317 | 14.270 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.66B | 329B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.95 | 14.57 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.63 | 42.81 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.78 | 44.65 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 234.57 | 92.49 | 254% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement