Ad is loading...
BATT vs URNM
BATT vs URNM Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs URNM
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.87
Change-$0.10 (-1.11%)
Volume$32K
Net Assets63.44M
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
Price$36.05
Change-$0.26 (-0.72%)
Volume$1.75K
Net Assets1.32B
BATT vs URNM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. URNM commentary
Feb 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and URNM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
URNM has more net assets: 1.33B vs. BATT (63.4M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than URNM: BATT (1.932) vs URNM (-9.923). BATT was incepted earlier than URNM: BATT (7 years) vs URNM (5 years). BATT has a higher turnover URNM (10.00) vs URNM (10.00).
| BATT | URNM | BATT / URNM | |
| Gain YTD | 1.932 | -9.923 | -19% |
| Net Assets | 63.4M | 1.33B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 10.00 | 420% |
| Yield | 3.61 | 3.55 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 27 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -1.52% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| TSLA - BATT | 52% Loosely correlated | -4.68% | ||
| FCEL - BATT | 51% Loosely correlated | -6.36% | ||
More | ||||
URNM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, URNM has been closely correlated with DNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if URNM jumps, then DNN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To URNM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| URNM | 100% | -3.28% | ||
| DNN - URNM | 87% Closely correlated | -2.53% | ||
| CCJ - URNM | 86% Closely correlated | -6.57% | ||
| NXE - URNM | 84% Closely correlated | -5.09% | ||
| UUUU - URNM | 83% Closely correlated | -4.72% | ||
| UEC - URNM | 81% Closely correlated | -5.02% | ||
More | ||||