Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs URNJ
BATT vs URNJ Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs URNJ
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$11.22
Change+$0.30 (+2.75%)
Volume$37.77K
Net Assets66.86M
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
Price$24.36
Change+$0.50 (+2.10%)
Volume$296.44K
Net Assets336.52M
BATT vs URNJ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. URNJ commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a StrongBuy and URNJ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
URNJ has more net assets: 337M vs. BATT (66.9M). URNJ has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: URNJ (31.109) vs BATT (27.466). BATT was incepted earlier than URNJ: BATT (7 years) vs URNJ (3 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than URNJ (0.80). BATT has a higher turnover URNJ (31.00) vs URNJ (31.00).
| BATT | URNJ | BATT / URNJ | |
| Gain YTD | 27.466 | 31.109 | 88% |
| Net Assets | 66.9M | 337M | 20% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.80 | 74% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 31.00 | 223% |
| Yield | 2.51 | 3.38 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | URNJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 18 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +2.72% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | +3.62% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| LAC - BATT | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 59% Loosely correlated | +6.46% | ||
More | ||||
URNJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that URNJ and MGA have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that URNJ and MGA's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To URNJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| URNJ | 100% | +2.10% | ||
| MGA - URNJ | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
| PEN - URNJ | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
| CVV - URNJ | 17% Poorly correlated | -4.48% | ||
| LOT - URNJ | 15% Poorly correlated | -5.80% | ||
| AEE - URNJ | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.25% |