9 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
BATT vs SQM
BATT vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs SQM
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.97
Change-$0.14 (-1.54%)
Volume$19.96K
Net Assets63.44M
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$39.67
Change-$0.14 (-0.35%)
Volume$684.09K
Capitalization13.99B
BATT vs SQM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. SQM commentary
Feb 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and SQM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQM: Fundamental Ratings
SQM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 17 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 89% | 13 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -1.52% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| TSLA - BATT | 52% Loosely correlated | -4.68% | ||
| FCEL - BATT | 51% Loosely correlated | -6.36% | ||
More | ||||
SQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been loosely correlated with ALTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALTM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQM | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| ALTM - SQM | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| AVNT - SQM | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| HUN - SQM | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| WLK - SQM | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| MEOH - SQM | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.15% | ||
More | ||||