Intraday BUY SELL Signals
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs SGML
BATT vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs SGML
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$15.69
Change+$2.32 (+17.35%)
Volume$89.89K
Net Assets110.64M
Sigma Lithium
Price$12.02
Change+$4.59 (+61.78%)
Volume$7.63M
Capitalization1.34B
BATT vs SGML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. SGML commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and SGML is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGML: Fundamental Ratings
SGML | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 21 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | SGML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +4.11% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | +4.83% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +3.46% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | +5.38% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.61% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 53% Loosely correlated | +11.35% | ||
More | ||||
SGML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGML | 100% | +11.35% | ||
| LAR - SGML | 49% Loosely correlated | +6.75% | ||
| PILBF - SGML | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| VALE - SGML | 43% Loosely correlated | +5.33% | ||
| GLNCY - SGML | 43% Loosely correlated | +4.03% | ||
| LAC - SGML | 42% Loosely correlated | +8.61% | ||
More | ||||