32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs SGML
BATT vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs SGML
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$10.49
Change-$0.07 (-0.66%)
Volume$63.37K
Net Assets68.37M
Sigma Lithium
Price$7.12
Change-$0.10 (-1.39%)
Volume$2.51M
Capitalization1.54B
BATT vs SGML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. SGML commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and SGML is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGML: Fundamental Ratings
SGML | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | SGML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 28 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 76% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
More | ||||
SGML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGML | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| LAR - SGML | 64% Loosely correlated | +5.90% | ||
| LAC - SGML | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.69% | ||
| FCX - SGML | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| SCCO - SGML | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| BHP - SGML | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
More | ||||