Ad is loading...
BATT vs SETM
BATT vs SETM Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs SETM
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.97
Change-$0.14 (-1.54%)
Volume$19.96K
Net Assets63.44M
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
Price$15.26
Change-$0.46 (-2.93%)
Volume$30.26K
Net Assets33.58M
BATT vs SETM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. SETM commentary
Feb 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and SETM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 63.4M vs. SETM (33.6M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than SETM: BATT (1.932) vs SETM (1.261). BATT was incepted earlier than SETM: BATT (7 years) vs SETM (2 years). BATT has a higher turnover SETM (33.00) vs SETM (33.00).
| BATT | SETM | BATT / SETM | |
| Gain YTD | 1.932 | 1.261 | 153% |
| Net Assets | 63.4M | 33.6M | 189% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 33.00 | 127% |
| Yield | 3.61 | 2.47 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 25 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 89% | 18 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -1.52% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| TSLA - BATT | 52% Loosely correlated | -4.68% | ||
| FCEL - BATT | 51% Loosely correlated | -6.36% | ||
More | ||||
SETM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SETM has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SETM jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SETM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SETM | 100% | -2.93% | ||
| FCX - SETM | 75% Closely correlated | -5.08% | ||
| HBM - SETM | 73% Closely correlated | -6.70% | ||
| SCCO - SETM | 71% Closely correlated | -5.02% | ||
| ERO - SETM | 69% Closely correlated | -5.88% | ||
| SQM - SETM | 66% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||