Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs SETM
BATT vs SETM Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs SETM
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$11.22
Change+$0.30 (+2.75%)
Volume$37.77K
Net Assets66.86M
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
Price$21.97
Change+$0.35 (+1.62%)
Volume$56.59K
Net Assets86.06M
BATT vs SETM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. SETM commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a StrongBuy and SETM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SETM has more net assets: 86.1M vs. BATT (66.9M). SETM has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: SETM (45.786) vs BATT (27.466). BATT was incepted earlier than SETM: BATT (7 years) vs SETM (3 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than SETM (0.65). BATT has a higher turnover SETM (37.00) vs SETM (37.00).
| BATT | SETM | BATT / SETM | |
| Gain YTD | 27.466 | 45.786 | 60% |
| Net Assets | 66.9M | 86.1M | 78% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.65 | 91% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 37.00 | 186% |
| Yield | 2.51 | 1.42 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 12 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 90% | 19 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +2.72% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | +3.62% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| LAC - BATT | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 59% Loosely correlated | +6.46% | ||
More | ||||
SETM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SETM has been loosely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SETM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SETM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SETM | 100% | +1.62% | ||
| ALB - SETM | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| SGML - SETM | 63% Loosely correlated | +6.46% | ||
| SQM - SETM | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.62% | ||
| LAC - SETM | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| VZLA - SETM | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.76% | ||
More | ||||