Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs SETM
BATT vs SETM Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs SETM
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$10.49
Change-$0.07 (-0.66%)
Volume$63.37K
Net Assets68.37M
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
Price$20.59
Change-$0.12 (-0.58%)
Volume$71.81K
Net Assets63.82M
BATT vs SETM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. SETM commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and SETM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 68.4M vs. SETM (63.8M). SETM has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: SETM (36.629) vs BATT (19.205). BATT was incepted earlier than SETM: BATT (7 years) vs SETM (2 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than SETM (0.65). BATT has a higher turnover SETM (37.00) vs SETM (37.00).
| BATT | SETM | BATT / SETM | |
| Gain YTD | 19.205 | 36.629 | 52% |
| Net Assets | 68.4M | 63.8M | 107% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.65 | 91% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 37.00 | 186% |
| Yield | 2.98 | 1.79 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 76% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
More | ||||
SETM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SETM has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SETM jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SETM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SETM | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| FCX - SETM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| HBM - SETM | 73% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| SCCO - SETM | 71% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| ERO - SETM | 69% Closely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| LAR - SETM | 67% Closely correlated | +5.90% | ||
More | ||||