Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs PYZ
BATT vs PYZ Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs PYZ
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$10.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
Volume$37.48K
Net Assets65.89M
Invesco DW Basic Materials Momt ETF
Price$101.49
Change+$0.22 (+0.22%)
Volume$374
Net Assets52.8M
BATT vs PYZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. PYZ commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and PYZ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 65.9M vs. PYZ (52.8M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than PYZ: BATT (21.932) vs PYZ (18.273). BATT was incepted earlier than PYZ: BATT (7 years) vs PYZ (19 years). BATT (0.59) and PYZ (0.60) have comparable expense ratios . BATT (69.00) and PYZ (69.00) have matching turnover.
| BATT | PYZ | BATT / PYZ | |
| Gain YTD | 21.932 | 18.273 | 120% |
| Net Assets | 65.9M | 52.8M | 125% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.60 | 98% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 69.00 | 100% |
| Yield | 2.82 | 1.01 | 280% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | PYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 11 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 18 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| LAC - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 61% Loosely correlated | +13.27% | ||
More | ||||
PYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PYZ and ATI have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PYZ and ATI's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y