Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs PYZ
BATT vs PYZ Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs PYZ
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$11.39
Change+$0.18 (+1.60%)
Volume$208
Net Assets68.55M
Invesco DW Basic Materials Momt ETF
Price$104.22
Change+$0.54 (+0.52%)
Volume$100
Net Assets54.4M
BATT vs PYZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. PYZ commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a StrongBuy and PYZ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 68.6M vs. PYZ (54.4M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than PYZ: BATT (27.466) vs PYZ (20.120). BATT was incepted earlier than PYZ: BATT (7 years) vs PYZ (19 years). BATT (0.59) and PYZ (0.60) have comparable expense ratios . BATT (69.00) and PYZ (69.00) have matching turnover.
| BATT | PYZ | BATT / PYZ | |
| Gain YTD | 27.466 | 20.120 | 137% |
| Net Assets | 68.6M | 54.4M | 126% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.60 | 98% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 69.00 | 100% |
| Yield | 2.51 | 0.93 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | PYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 89% | 12 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +2.72% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | +3.62% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| LAC - BATT | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 59% Loosely correlated | +6.46% | ||
More | ||||
PYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PYZ and SCL have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PYZ and SCL's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYZ | 100% | +1.39% | ||
| SCL - PYZ | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.31% | ||
| CF - PYZ | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
| HWKN - PYZ | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
| BCPC - PYZ | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.15% | ||
| ECL - PYZ | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||