Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs PICK
BATT vs PICK Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs PICK
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$13.55
Change-$0.25 (-1.81%)
Volume$100
Net Assets101.4M
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
Price$46.32
Change-$0.63 (-1.34%)
Volume$643.51K
Net Assets862.51M
BATT vs PICK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. PICK commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and PICK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PICK has more net assets: 863M vs. BATT (101M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than PICK: BATT (56.818) vs PICK (36.738). BATT was incepted earlier than PICK: BATT (7 years) vs PICK (14 years). PICK (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than BATT (0.59). BATT has a higher turnover PICK (11.00) vs PICK (11.00).
| BATT | PICK | BATT / PICK | |
| Gain YTD | 56.818 | 36.738 | 155% |
| Net Assets | 101M | 863M | 12% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.39 | 151% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 11.00 | 627% |
| Yield | 2.04 | 2.87 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | PICK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +0.88% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +6.20% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
More | ||||
PICK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PICK has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PICK jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PICK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PICK | 100% | +1.65% | ||
| BHP - PICK | 87% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| RIO - PICK | 82% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| MT - PICK | 73% Closely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| AA - PICK | 67% Closely correlated | +6.80% | ||
| CENX - PICK | 59% Loosely correlated | +6.06% | ||
More | ||||