Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs PICK
BATT vs PICK Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs PICK
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$10.49
Change-$0.07 (-0.66%)
Volume$63.37K
Net Assets68.37M
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
Price$40.34
Change-$0.40 (-0.98%)
Volume$491.84K
Net Assets808.81M
BATT vs PICK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. PICK commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and PICK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PICK has more net assets: 809M vs. BATT (68.4M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than PICK: BATT (19.205) vs PICK (17.487). BATT was incepted earlier than PICK: BATT (7 years) vs PICK (13 years). PICK (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than BATT (0.59). BATT has a higher turnover PICK (11.00) vs PICK (11.00).
| BATT | PICK | BATT / PICK | |
| Gain YTD | 19.205 | 17.487 | 110% |
| Net Assets | 68.4M | 809M | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.39 | 151% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 11.00 | 627% |
| Yield | 2.98 | 3.53 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | PICK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 76% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
More | ||||
PICK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PICK has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PICK jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PICK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PICK | 100% | -0.98% | ||
| BHP - PICK | 87% Closely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| RIO - PICK | 86% Closely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| FCX - PICK | 85% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| SCCO - PICK | 79% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| HBM - PICK | 77% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
More | ||||