Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs PICK
BATT vs PICK Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs PICK
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$9.63
Change+$0.12 (+1.26%)
Volume$12.39K
Net Assets64.07M
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
Price$39.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$89.34K
Net Assets785.17M
BATT vs PICK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. PICK commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and PICK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PICK has more net assets: 785M vs. BATT (64.1M). PICK has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: PICK (13.963) vs BATT (9.449). BATT was incepted earlier than PICK: BATT (7 years) vs PICK (13 years). PICK (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than BATT (0.59). BATT has a higher turnover PICK (11.00) vs PICK (11.00).
| BATT | PICK | BATT / PICK | |
| Gain YTD | 9.449 | 13.963 | 68% |
| Net Assets | 64.1M | 785M | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.39 | 151% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 11.00 | 382% |
| Yield | 2.98 | 3.53 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | PICK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 76% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +7.90% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||
PICK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PICK has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PICK jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PICK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PICK | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| BHP - PICK | 87% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| RIO - PICK | 86% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| FCX - PICK | 85% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| SCCO - PICK | 79% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| HBM - PICK | 77% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
More | ||||