Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs LITP
BATT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs LITP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$10.49
Change-$0.07 (-0.66%)
Volume$63.37K
Net Assets68.37M
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$7.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$28.28K
Net Assets20.25M
BATT vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. LITP commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and LITP is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 68.4M vs. LITP (20.2M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: BATT (19.205) vs LITP (17.290). BATT was incepted earlier than LITP: BATT (7 years) vs LITP (2 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LITP (0.65). BATT has a higher turnover LITP (49.00) vs LITP (49.00).
| BATT | LITP | BATT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | 19.205 | 17.290 | 111% |
| Net Assets | 68.4M | 20.2M | 339% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.65 | 91% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 49.00 | 141% |
| Yield | 2.98 | 7.64 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 76% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -0.06% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 72% Closely correlated | -5.24% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +5.90% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.69% | ||
More | ||||