Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs LITP
BATT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs LITP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$11.29
Change+$0.07 (+0.62%)
Volume$100
Net Assets68.55M
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$8.35
Change+$0.12 (+1.46%)
Volume$158
Net Assets21.16M
BATT vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. LITP commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a StrongBuy and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 68.6M vs. LITP (21.2M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: BATT (27.466) vs LITP (23.204). BATT was incepted earlier than LITP: BATT (7 years) vs LITP (3 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LITP (0.65). BATT has a higher turnover LITP (49.00) vs LITP (49.00).
| BATT | LITP | BATT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | 27.466 | 23.204 | 118% |
| Net Assets | 68.6M | 21.2M | 324% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.65 | 91% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 49.00 | 141% |
| Yield | 2.51 | 5.41 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 89% | 15 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +2.72% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | +3.62% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| LAC - BATT | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 59% Loosely correlated | +6.46% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +5.72% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 76% Closely correlated | +3.62% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 76% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | +6.46% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 49% Loosely correlated | +6.01% | ||
More | ||||