Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs LITP
BATT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs LITP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$15.26
Change+$0.09 (+0.59%)
Volume$135
Net Assets105.18M
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$15.13
Change-$0.11 (-0.72%)
Volume$980
Net Assets58.02M
BATT vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. LITP commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 105M vs. LITP (58M). LITP has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: LITP (26.557) vs BATT (9.928). BATT was incepted earlier than LITP: BATT (8 years) vs LITP (3 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LITP (0.65). BATT has a higher turnover LITP (49.00) vs LITP (49.00).
| BATT | LITP | BATT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | 9.928 | 26.557 | 37% |
| Net Assets | 105M | 58M | 181% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.65 | 91% |
| Turnover | 73.00 | 49.00 | 149% |
| Yield | 1.85 | 7.37 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +1.40% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | +3.17% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.72% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.83% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 53% Loosely correlated | +6.69% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +0.93% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +2.72% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 70% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 69% Closely correlated | +2.58% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | +6.69% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.77% | ||
More | ||||