Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs LITP
BATT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs LITP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$14.27
Change+$0.07 (+0.49%)
Volume$49.31K
Net Assets98.87M
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$12.75
Change+$0.10 (+0.79%)
Volume$104.3K
Net Assets40.74M
BATT vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. LITP commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a StrongBuy and LITP is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 98.9M vs. LITP (40.7M). LITP has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: LITP (90.930) vs BATT (62.159). BATT was incepted earlier than LITP: BATT (8 years) vs LITP (3 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LITP (0.65). BATT has a higher turnover LITP (49.00) vs LITP (49.00).
| BATT | LITP | BATT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | 62.159 | 90.930 | 68% |
| Net Assets | 98.9M | 40.7M | 243% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.65 | 91% |
| Turnover | 73.00 | 49.00 | 149% |
| Yield | 2.09 | 3.62 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| AMG - BATT | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 70% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 69% Closely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
More | ||||