Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs LITP
BATT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs LITP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$13.55
Change-$0.25 (-1.81%)
Volume$100
Net Assets92.93M
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$10.89
Change+$0.40 (+3.81%)
Volume$2.29K
Net Assets29.95M
BATT vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. LITP commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and LITP is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 92.9M vs. LITP (30M). LITP (57.036) and BATT (56.818) have matching annual dividend yield . BATT was incepted earlier than LITP: BATT (7 years) vs LITP (3 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LITP (0.65). BATT has a higher turnover LITP (49.00) vs LITP (49.00).
| BATT | LITP | BATT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | 56.818 | 57.036 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 92.9M | 30M | 310% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.65 | 91% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 49.00 | 141% |
| Yield | 2.04 | 4.31 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +0.88% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +6.20% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +1.60% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 70% Closely correlated | +6.20% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 69% Closely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
More | ||||