Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs LIT
BATT vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs LIT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$13.69
Change+$0.29 (+2.16%)
Volume$801
Net Assets90.92M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$63.08
Change+$0.27 (+0.43%)
Volume$715
Net Assets1.4B
BATT vs LIT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. LIT commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and LIT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.4B vs. BATT (90.9M). LIT (54.420) and BATT (52.045) have matching annual dividend yield . BATT was incepted earlier than LIT: BATT (8 years) vs LIT (15 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). BATT has a higher turnover LIT (22.87) vs LIT (22.87).
| BATT | LIT | BATT / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 52.045 | 54.420 | 96% |
| Net Assets | 90.9M | 1.4B | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.75 | 79% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 22.87 | 302% |
| Yield | 2.09 | 0.42 | 493% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 89% | 13 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 52% Loosely correlated | -8.72% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 73% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 59% Loosely correlated | -8.72% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||