Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs LIT
BATT vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs LIT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.93
Change-$0.13 (-1.43%)
Volume$19.34K
Net Assets57.82M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$36.93
Change-$0.67 (-1.78%)
Volume$162.95K
Net Assets807.72M
BATT vs LIT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. LIT commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and LIT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 808M vs. BATT (57.8M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: BATT (1.477) vs LIT (-9.441). BATT was incepted earlier than LIT: BATT (7 years) vs LIT (15 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). BATT has a higher turnover LIT (22.87) vs LIT (22.87).
| BATT | LIT | BATT / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 1.477 | -9.441 | -16% |
| Net Assets | 57.8M | 808M | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.75 | 79% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 22.87 | 184% |
| Yield | 3.21 | 1.04 | 308% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -1.48% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 75% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.53% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y