BATT | ILIT | BATT / ILIT | |
Gain YTD | 21.932 | 17.555 | 125% |
Net Assets | 65.9M | 5.64M | 1,169% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.47 | 126% |
Turnover | 69.00 | 73.00 | 95% |
Yield | 2.82 | 6.41 | 44% |
Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
BATT | ILIT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago89% | 10 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 4 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago61% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BATT | 100% | -0.09% | ||
ALB - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
LAC - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.40% | ||
SGML - BATT | 61% Loosely correlated | +13.27% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ILIT and LAR have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ILIT and LAR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ILIT | 100% | +2.41% | ||
LAR - ILIT | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.48% | ||
ALB - ILIT | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
SQM - ILIT | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.01% | ||
SGML - ILIT | 14% Poorly correlated | +13.27% | ||
LAC - ILIT | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
More |