Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs ICOP
BATT vs ICOP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs ICOP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$10.35
Change-$0.14 (-1.33%)
Volume$70.42K
Net Assets68.37M
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Price$30.10
Change-$0.51 (-1.67%)
Volume$24.48K
Net Assets71.85M
BATT vs ICOP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. ICOP commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and ICOP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICOP (71.8M) and BATT (68.4M) have similar net assets . ICOP has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: ICOP (19.162) vs BATT (17.614). BATT was incepted earlier than ICOP: BATT (7 years) vs ICOP (2 years). ICOP (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than BATT (0.59). BATT has a higher turnover ICOP (37.00) vs ICOP (37.00).
| BATT | ICOP | BATT / ICOP | |
| Gain YTD | 17.614 | 19.162 | 92% |
| Net Assets | 68.4M | 71.8M | 95% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.47 | 126% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 37.00 | 186% |
| Yield | 2.98 | 2.42 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -1.33% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 76% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -6.05% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | -8.01% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
More | ||||
ICOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with SCCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then SCCO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOP | 100% | -1.69% | ||
| SCCO - ICOP | 91% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| FCX - ICOP | 91% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| HBM - ICOP | 86% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| BHP - ICOP | 83% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| RIO - ICOP | 82% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
More | ||||