Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs ICOP
BATT vs ICOP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs ICOP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$9.63
Change+$0.12 (+1.26%)
Volume$12.39K
Net Assets64.07M
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Price$30.81
Change-$0.22 (-0.71%)
Volume$5.68K
Net Assets69.26M
BATT vs ICOP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. ICOP commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and ICOP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICOP has more net assets: 69.3M vs. BATT (64.1M). ICOP has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: ICOP (21.982) vs BATT (9.449). BATT was incepted earlier than ICOP: BATT (7 years) vs ICOP (2 years). ICOP (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than BATT (0.59). ICOP has a higher turnover BATT (42.00) vs BATT (42.00).
| BATT | ICOP | BATT / ICOP | |
| Gain YTD | 9.449 | 21.982 | 43% |
| Net Assets | 64.1M | 69.3M | 92% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.47 | 126% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 55.00 | 76% |
| Yield | 2.98 | 2.42 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 90% | 17 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 76% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +7.90% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||
ICOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with SCCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then SCCO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOP | 100% | -0.71% | ||
| SCCO - ICOP | 92% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| FCX - ICOP | 92% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| HBM - ICOP | 87% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| BHP - ICOP | 85% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| RIO - ICOP | 83% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
More | ||||