Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs ICOP
BATT vs ICOP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs ICOP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$12.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$88.3K
Net Assets75.26M
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Price$36.15
Change+$0.44 (+1.23%)
Volume$35.04K
Net Assets88.09M
BATT vs ICOP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. ICOP commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and ICOP is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICOP has more net assets: 88.1M vs. BATT (75.3M). ICOP (43.123) and BATT (41.477) have matching annual dividend yield . BATT was incepted earlier than ICOP: BATT (7 years) vs ICOP (2 years). ICOP (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than BATT (0.59). BATT has a higher turnover ICOP (37.00) vs ICOP (37.00).
| BATT | ICOP | BATT / ICOP | |
| Gain YTD | 41.477 | 43.123 | 96% |
| Net Assets | 75.3M | 88.1M | 85% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.47 | 126% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 37.00 | 186% |
| Yield | 2.51 | 2.24 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | N/A | ||
| ALB - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | +3.85% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| NIO - BATT | 54% Loosely correlated | -5.76% | ||
More | ||||
ICOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOP | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| RIO - ICOP | 79% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| BHP - ICOP | 68% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| NEM - ICOP | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| AAL - ICOP | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| TKO - ICOP | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.66% |