Ad is loading...
BATT vs HAP
BATT vs HAP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs HAP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.97
Change-$0.14 (-1.54%)
Volume$19.96K
Net Assets63.44M
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Price$48.82
Change-$0.67 (-1.35%)
Volume$10.61K
Net Assets146.44M
BATT vs HAP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. HAP commentary
Feb 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and HAP is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAP has more net assets: 146M vs. BATT (63.4M). HAP has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: HAP (7.982) vs BATT (2.614). BATT was incepted earlier than HAP: BATT (7 years) vs HAP (17 years). BATT has a higher turnover HAP (26.00) vs HAP (26.00).
| BATT | HAP | BATT / HAP | |
| Gain YTD | 2.614 | 7.982 | 33% |
| Net Assets | 63.4M | 146M | 43% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 26.00 | 162% |
| Yield | 3.61 | 3.14 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 89% | 17 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.55% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.92% | ||
| TSLA - BATT | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| FCEL - BATT | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
More | ||||
HAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAP has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAP jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y