Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs HAP
BATT vs HAP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs HAP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$9.63
Change+$0.12 (+1.26%)
Volume$12.39K
Net Assets64.07M
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Price$53.59
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
Volume$3.44K
Net Assets163.28M
BATT vs HAP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. HAP commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and HAP is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAP has more net assets: 163M vs. BATT (64.1M). HAP has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: HAP (17.522) vs BATT (9.449). BATT was incepted earlier than HAP: BATT (7 years) vs HAP (17 years). HAP (0.42) has a lower expense ratio than BATT (0.59). HAP has a higher turnover BATT (42.00) vs BATT (42.00).
| BATT | HAP | BATT / HAP | |
| Gain YTD | 9.449 | 17.522 | 54% |
| Net Assets | 64.1M | 163M | 39% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.42 | 140% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 54.00 | 78% |
| Yield | 2.98 | 2.33 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 76% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +7.90% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||
HAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAP has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAP jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAP | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| SHEL - HAP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| E - HAP | 76% Closely correlated | -1.68% | ||
| RIO - HAP | 74% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| WDS - HAP | 73% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| FANG - HAP | 67% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
More | ||||