Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs GMET
BATT vs GMET Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs GMET
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$15.69
Change+$2.32 (+17.35%)
Volume$89.89K
Net Assets110.64M
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$45.46
Change+$12.23 (+36.80%)
Volume$12K
Net Assets36.35M
BATT vs GMET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. GMET commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and GMET is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 111M vs. GMET (36.3M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: GMET (22.732) vs BATT (13.696). BATT was incepted earlier than GMET: BATT (8 years) vs GMET (4 years). BATT (0.59) and GMET (0.61) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover GMET (20.00) vs GMET (20.00).
| BATT | GMET | BATT / GMET | |
| Gain YTD | 13.696 | 22.732 | 60% |
| Net Assets | 111M | 36.3M | 306% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.61 | 97% |
| Turnover | 73.00 | 20.00 | 365% |
| Yield | 1.66 | 1.57 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | GMET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 28 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +4.11% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | +4.83% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +3.46% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | +5.38% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.61% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 53% Loosely correlated | +11.35% | ||
More | ||||
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GMET and SGML have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMET and SGML's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | +5.55% | ||
| SGML - GMET | 22% Poorly correlated | +11.35% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 15% Poorly correlated | +5.38% | ||
| ALB - GMET | 12% Poorly correlated | +3.46% | ||
| AAL - GMET | 11% Poorly correlated | +2.34% | ||
| TECK - GMET | 6% Poorly correlated | +8.58% | ||
More | ||||