Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs GMET
BATT vs GMET Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs GMET
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$9.63
Change+$0.12 (+1.26%)
Volume$12.39K
Net Assets64.07M
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$24.60
Change-$0.12 (-0.49%)
Volume$4.26K
Net Assets19.77M
BATT vs GMET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. GMET commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and GMET is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 64.1M vs. GMET (19.8M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: GMET (18.099) vs BATT (9.449). BATT was incepted earlier than GMET: BATT (7 years) vs GMET (4 years). BATT (0.59) and GMET (0.61) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover GMET (20.00) vs GMET (20.00).
| BATT | GMET | BATT / GMET | |
| Gain YTD | 9.449 | 18.099 | 52% |
| Net Assets | 64.1M | 19.8M | 324% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.61 | 97% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 20.00 | 210% |
| Yield | 2.98 | 1.65 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | GMET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 76% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +7.90% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMET has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMET jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | -0.50% | ||
| LAR - GMET | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| LAC - GMET | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| SCCO - GMET | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| SGML - GMET | -3% Poorly correlated | +7.90% | ||
| AMS - GMET | -4% Poorly correlated | +2.36% | ||
More | ||||