Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs GMET
BATT vs GMET Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs GMET
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$10.49
Change-$0.07 (-0.66%)
Volume$63.37K
Net Assets68.37M
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$25.88
Change-$0.11 (-0.42%)
Volume$6.4K
Net Assets20.69M
BATT vs GMET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. GMET commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and GMET is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 68.4M vs. GMET (20.7M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: GMET (24.243) vs BATT (19.205). BATT was incepted earlier than GMET: BATT (7 years) vs GMET (4 years). BATT (0.59) and GMET (0.61) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover GMET (20.00) vs GMET (20.00).
| BATT | GMET | BATT / GMET | |
| Gain YTD | 19.205 | 24.243 | 79% |
| Net Assets | 68.4M | 20.7M | 330% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.61 | 97% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 20.00 | 345% |
| Yield | 2.98 | 1.65 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | GMET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 76% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
More | ||||
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMET has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMET jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| LAR - GMET | 63% Loosely correlated | +5.90% | ||
| LAC - GMET | 59% Loosely correlated | -4.69% | ||
| SCCO - GMET | 0% Poorly correlated | -1.30% | ||
| SGML - GMET | -3% Poorly correlated | -1.39% | ||
| AMS - GMET | -4% Poorly correlated | +1.12% | ||
More | ||||