Ad is loading...
BATT vs GMET
BATT vs GMET Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs GMET
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.97
Change-$0.14 (-1.54%)
Volume$19.96K
Net Assets63.44M
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$21.53
Change-$0.22 (-1.01%)
Volume$1.24K
Net Assets17.31M
BATT vs GMET Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. GMET commentary
Feb 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and GMET is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 63.4M vs. GMET (17.3M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: GMET (6.817) vs BATT (2.614). BATT was incepted earlier than GMET: BATT (7 years) vs GMET (3 years). BATT has a higher turnover GMET (28.00) vs GMET (28.00).
| BATT | GMET | BATT / GMET | |
| Gain YTD | 2.614 | 6.817 | 38% |
| Net Assets | 63.4M | 17.3M | 366% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 28.00 | 150% |
| Yield | 3.61 | 2.04 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | GMET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 28 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 28 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 28 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | about 1 month ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 89% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.55% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.92% | ||
| TSLA - BATT | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| FCEL - BATT | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
More | ||||
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMET has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMET jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| LAC - GMET | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| ALTM - GMET | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SCCO - GMET | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| SGML - GMET | -3% Poorly correlated | -1.24% | ||
| AMS - GMET | -4% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
More | ||||