Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs GMET
BATT vs GMET Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs GMET
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$13.68
Change+$0.28 (+2.09%)
Volume$135.69K
Net Assets92.04M
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$34.41
Change+$0.80 (+2.38%)
Volume$617
Net Assets25.43M
BATT vs GMET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. GMET commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and GMET is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 92M vs. GMET (25.4M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: GMET (61.210) vs BATT (52.045). BATT was incepted earlier than GMET: BATT (8 years) vs GMET (4 years). BATT (0.59) and GMET (0.61) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover GMET (20.00) vs GMET (20.00).
| BATT | GMET | BATT / GMET | |
| Gain YTD | 52.045 | 61.210 | 85% |
| Net Assets | 92M | 25.4M | 362% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.61 | 97% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 20.00 | 345% |
| Yield | 2.09 | 1.17 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | GMET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 89% | 13 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 52% Loosely correlated | -8.72% | ||
More | ||||
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMET has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMET jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | -0.83% | ||
| LAC - GMET | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| SGML - GMET | 22% Poorly correlated | -8.72% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
| ALB - GMET | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| TECK - GMET | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||