Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs GMET
BATT vs GMET Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs GMET
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$11.29
Change+$0.07 (+0.62%)
Volume$100
Net Assets68.55M
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$27.70
Change+$0.12 (+0.44%)
Volume$200
Net Assets22.13M
BATT vs GMET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. GMET commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a StrongBuy and GMET is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 68.6M vs. GMET (22.1M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: GMET (32.388) vs BATT (27.466). BATT was incepted earlier than GMET: BATT (7 years) vs GMET (4 years). BATT (0.59) and GMET (0.61) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover GMET (20.00) vs GMET (20.00).
| BATT | GMET | BATT / GMET | |
| Gain YTD | 27.466 | 32.388 | 85% |
| Net Assets | 68.6M | 22.1M | 310% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.61 | 97% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 20.00 | 345% |
| Yield | 2.51 | 1.46 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | GMET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 90% | 13 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +2.72% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | +3.62% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| LAC - BATT | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 59% Loosely correlated | +6.46% | ||
More | ||||
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GMET and SQM have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMET and SQM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | +2.06% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 15% Poorly correlated | +3.62% | ||
| ALB - GMET | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.86% | ||
| AAL - GMET | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.71% | ||
| LAR - GMET | 11% Poorly correlated | +6.01% | ||
| SGML - GMET | 10% Poorly correlated | +6.46% | ||
More | ||||