Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs GMET
BATT vs GMET Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs GMET
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$10.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
Volume$37.48K
Net Assets65.89M
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$26.21
Change+$0.18 (+0.69%)
Volume$1.03K
Net Assets21.02M
BATT vs GMET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. GMET commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and GMET is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 65.9M vs. GMET (21M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: GMET (24.948) vs BATT (22.045). BATT was incepted earlier than GMET: BATT (7 years) vs GMET (4 years). BATT (0.59) and GMET (0.61) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover GMET (20.00) vs GMET (20.00).
| BATT | GMET | BATT / GMET | |
| Gain YTD | 22.045 | 24.948 | 88% |
| Net Assets | 65.9M | 21M | 314% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.61 | 97% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 20.00 | 345% |
| Yield | 2.82 | 1.63 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | GMET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 9 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 17 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.58% | ||
| LAC - BATT | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.05% | ||
More | ||||
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GMET and SQM have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMET and SQM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | -0.89% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.96% | ||
| LAR - GMET | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.60% | ||
| AAL - GMET | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.21% | ||
| ALB - GMET | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
| AMS - GMET | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
More | ||||