Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs FTAG
BATT vs FTAG Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs FTAG
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$13.68
Change+$0.28 (+2.09%)
Volume$135.69K
Net Assets92.04M
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
Price$26.02
Change-$0.08 (-0.31%)
Volume$526
Net Assets6.24M
BATT vs FTAG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. FTAG commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and FTAG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 92M vs. FTAG (6.24M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than FTAG: BATT (52.045) vs FTAG (13.678). BATT was incepted earlier than FTAG: BATT (8 years) vs FTAG (16 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than FTAG (0.70). BATT has a higher turnover FTAG (11.00) vs FTAG (11.00).
| BATT | FTAG | BATT / FTAG | |
| Gain YTD | 52.045 | 13.678 | 380% |
| Net Assets | 92M | 6.24M | 1,474% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.70 | 84% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 11.00 | 627% |
| Yield | 2.09 | 2.42 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | FTAG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 9 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 89% | 16 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 52% Loosely correlated | -8.72% | ||
More | ||||
FTAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTAG has been loosely correlated with CTVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTAG jumps, then CTVA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTAG | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| CTVA - FTAG | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| ASIX - FTAG | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| LXU - FTAG | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.21% | ||
| NTR - FTAG | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| CMP - FTAG | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
More | ||||