Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs DMAT
BATT vs DMAT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs DMAT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$13.62
Change-$0.18 (-1.30%)
Volume$73.85K
Net Assets101.4M
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$24.60
Change+$0.15 (+0.61%)
Volume$9.1K
Net Assets10.39M
BATT vs DMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. DMAT commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and DMAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 101M vs. DMAT (10.4M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: DMAT (75.544) vs BATT (54.773). BATT was incepted earlier than DMAT: BATT (7 years) vs DMAT (4 years). BATT (0.59) and DMAT (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover DMAT (22.42) vs DMAT (22.42).
| BATT | DMAT | BATT / DMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 54.773 | 75.544 | 73% |
| Net Assets | 101M | 10.4M | 971% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 22.42 | 308% |
| Yield | 2.04 | 0.93 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | DMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 89% | 11 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -1.30% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +3.85% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
More | ||||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 36% Loosely correlated | -5.54% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 28% Poorly correlated | +3.85% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 16% Poorly correlated | -2.15% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 12% Poorly correlated | -5.74% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | +7.69% | ||
More | ||||