Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs DMAT
BATT vs DMAT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs DMAT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$12.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$241
Net Assets74.38M
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$23.26
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
Volume$100
Net Assets7.22M
BATT vs DMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. DMAT commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and DMAT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 74.4M vs. DMAT (7.22M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: DMAT (65.727) vs BATT (41.477). BATT was incepted earlier than DMAT: BATT (7 years) vs DMAT (4 years). BATT (0.59) and DMAT (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover DMAT (22.42) vs DMAT (22.42).
| BATT | DMAT | BATT / DMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 41.477 | 65.727 | 63% |
| Net Assets | 74.4M | 7.22M | 1,030% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 22.42 | 308% |
| Yield | 2.51 | 1.09 | 230% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | DMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +1.06% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | +3.98% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 59% Loosely correlated | +4.09% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | +9.92% | ||
| NIO - BATT | 54% Loosely correlated | +4.92% | ||
More | ||||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DMAT and ALB have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMAT and ALB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +1.93% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 17% Poorly correlated | +3.98% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 10% Poorly correlated | +19.22% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 8% Poorly correlated | +22.63% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.89% | ||
More | ||||