Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs DMAT
BATT vs DMAT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs DMAT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$13.77
Change+$0.09 (+0.66%)
Volume$400
Net Assets92.04M
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$25.58
Change+$0.07 (+0.27%)
Volume$8.37K
Net Assets11.62M
BATT vs DMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. DMAT commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and DMAT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 92M vs. DMAT (11.6M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: DMAT (82.008) vs BATT (55.455). BATT was incepted earlier than DMAT: BATT (8 years) vs DMAT (4 years). BATT (0.59) and DMAT (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover DMAT (22.42) vs DMAT (22.42).
| BATT | DMAT | BATT / DMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 55.455 | 82.008 | 68% |
| Net Assets | 92M | 11.6M | 793% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 22.42 | 308% |
| Yield | 2.09 | 0.90 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | DMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 89% | 14 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +2.09% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | +2.93% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| AMG - BATT | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.03% | ||
More | ||||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +1.27% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.78% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 16% Poorly correlated | +2.03% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 12% Poorly correlated | +7.10% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.45% | ||
More | ||||