Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs DMAT
BATT vs DMAT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs DMAT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$13.10
Change-$0.16 (-1.21%)
Volume$68.3K
Net Assets88.6M
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$24.41
Change-$0.80 (-3.17%)
Volume$18.93K
Net Assets9.99M
BATT vs DMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. DMAT commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and DMAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 88.6M vs. DMAT (9.99M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: DMAT (74.160) vs BATT (48.864). BATT was incepted earlier than DMAT: BATT (7 years) vs DMAT (4 years). BATT (0.59) and DMAT (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover DMAT (22.42) vs DMAT (22.42).
| BATT | DMAT | BATT / DMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 48.864 | 74.160 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 88.6M | 9.99M | 887% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 22.42 | 308% |
| Yield | 2.16 | 0.94 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | DMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 89% | 13 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -1.21% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.89% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | -8.41% | ||
More | ||||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DMAT and ALB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMAT and ALB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | -3.17% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.68% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 14% Poorly correlated | -8.12% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 11% Poorly correlated | +6.24% | ||
| NIC - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.22% | ||
More | ||||