Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs DMAT
BATT vs DMAT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs DMAT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$11.22
Change+$0.30 (+2.75%)
Volume$161
Net Assets66.86M
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$21.30
Change+$0.70 (+3.40%)
Volume$471
Net Assets5.53M
BATT vs DMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. DMAT commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and DMAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 66.9M vs. DMAT (5.53M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: DMAT (47.040) vs BATT (24.091). BATT was incepted earlier than DMAT: BATT (7 years) vs DMAT (4 years). BATT (0.59) and DMAT (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover DMAT (22.42) vs DMAT (22.42).
| BATT | DMAT | BATT / DMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 24.091 | 47.040 | 51% |
| Net Assets | 66.9M | 5.53M | 1,211% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 22.42 | 308% |
| Yield | 2.51 | 1.09 | 230% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | DMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 89% | 8 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 90% | 17 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -1.71% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| LAC - BATT | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DMAT and ALB have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMAT and ALB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | -2.44% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| NIC - DMAT | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.21% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.45% | ||
More | ||||