Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs DMAT
BATT vs DMAT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs DMAT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$15.69
Change+$2.32 (+17.35%)
Volume$89.89K
Net Assets110.64M
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$33.31
Change+$7.90 (+31.09%)
Volume$28.86K
Net Assets41.9M
BATT vs DMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. DMAT commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and DMAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 111M vs. DMAT (41.9M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: DMAT (19.920) vs BATT (13.696). BATT was incepted earlier than DMAT: BATT (8 years) vs DMAT (4 years). BATT (0.59) and DMAT (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover DMAT (46.71) vs DMAT (46.71).
| BATT | DMAT | BATT / DMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 13.696 | 19.920 | 69% |
| Net Assets | 111M | 41.9M | 265% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 73.00 | 46.71 | 156% |
| Yield | 1.66 | 0.55 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | DMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +4.11% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | +4.83% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +3.46% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | +5.38% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.61% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 53% Loosely correlated | +11.35% | ||
More | ||||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +5.21% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 36% Loosely correlated | +8.61% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 19% Poorly correlated | +3.46% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 16% Poorly correlated | -2.50% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 12% Poorly correlated | +9.91% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.41% | ||
More | ||||