Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs DMAT
BATT vs DMAT Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs DMAT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$15.17
Change+$0.21 (+1.40%)
Volume$99.91K
Net Assets105.18M
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$32.11
Change+$0.56 (+1.77%)
Volume$56.79K
Net Assets29.05M
BATT vs DMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. DMAT commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and DMAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 105M vs. DMAT (29M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: DMAT (15.600) vs BATT (9.928). BATT was incepted earlier than DMAT: BATT (8 years) vs DMAT (4 years). BATT (0.59) and DMAT (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . BATT has a higher turnover DMAT (22.42) vs DMAT (22.42).
| BATT | DMAT | BATT / DMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 9.928 | 15.600 | 64% |
| Net Assets | 105M | 29M | 362% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 100% |
| Turnover | 73.00 | 22.42 | 326% |
| Yield | 1.85 | 0.65 | 284% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | DMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +1.40% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | +3.17% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.72% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.83% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 53% Loosely correlated | +6.69% | ||
More | ||||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +1.78% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 36% Loosely correlated | +3.77% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.21% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||