BARK
Price
$0.61
Change
-$0.04 (-6.15%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
111.28M
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LOW
Price
$244.47
Change
+$1.47 (+0.60%)
Updated
Dec 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
136.31B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BARK vs LOW

Header iconBARK vs LOW Comparison
Open Charts BARK vs LOWBanner chart's image
BARK
Price$0.61
Change-$0.04 (-6.15%)
Volume$915.48K
Capitalization111.28M
Lowe's Companies
Price$244.47
Change+$1.47 (+0.60%)
Volume$12.14K
Capitalization136.31B
BARK vs LOW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BARK vs. LOW commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BARK is a Hold and LOW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BARK: $0.65 vs. LOW: $243.00)
Brand notoriety: BARK: Not notable vs. LOW: Notable
BARK represents the Specialty Stores, while LOW is part of the Home Improvement Chains industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BARK: 76% vs. LOW: 26%
Market capitalization -- BARK: $111.28M vs. LOW: $136.31B
BARK [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $111.28M. LOW’s [@Home Improvement Chains] market capitalization is $136.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $50.08B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry ranges from $345.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.08B. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry is $39.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BARK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLOW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BARK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LOW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOW is a better buy in the long-term than BARK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BARK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOW’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BARK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LOW’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LOW is a better buy in the short-term than BARK.

Price Growth

BARK (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +1.15% price change this week, while LOW (@Home Improvement Chains) price change was -2.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.41%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

BARK is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

LOW is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.07% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

@Home Improvement Chains (-0.58% weekly)

The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOW($136B) has a higher market cap than BARK($111M). LOW YTD gains are higher at: 0.432 vs. BARK (-64.755). LOW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.5B vs. BARK (-21.82M). LOW has more cash in the bank: 621M vs. BARK (63.4M). BARK has less debt than LOW: BARK (82.6M) vs LOW (44.7B). LOW has higher revenues than BARK: LOW (84.3B) vs BARK (452M).
BARKLOWBARK / LOW
Capitalization111M136B0%
EBITDA-21.82M12.5B-0%
Gain YTD-64.7550.432-14,976%
P/E RatioN/A20.12-
Revenue452M84.3B1%
Total Cash63.4M621M10%
Total Debt82.6M44.7B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOW: Fundamental Ratings
LOW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
16
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38
SMR RATING
1..100
6
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
33

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BARKLOW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BARK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LOW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PUMSY2.480.01
+0.40%
Puma SE
WTXR0.08N/A
N/A
West Texas Resources, Inc.
FGFI19.55N/A
N/A
First Greenwich Financial Inc.
KAOOY8.04-0.04
-0.50%
Kao Corp.
DTLIF10.21-0.12
-1.16%
D2L INC.

BARK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BARK has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BARK jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BARK
1D Price
Change %
BARK100%
+5.29%
HNST - BARK
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
CHPT - BARK
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
LOW - BARK
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
CPRT - BARK
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
HD - BARK
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
More

LOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOW has been closely correlated with HD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOW jumps, then HD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOW
1D Price
Change %
LOW100%
+0.35%
HD - LOW
89%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
FND - LOW
67%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
HVT - LOW
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
CPRT - LOW
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
ASO - LOW
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.98%
More