BAP
Price
$353.30
Change
-$3.10 (-0.87%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
28.04B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SHG
Price
$65.16
Change
+$3.37 (+5.45%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
30.17B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAP vs SHG

Header iconBAP vs SHG Comparison
Open Charts BAP vs SHGBanner chart's image
Credi
Price$353.30
Change-$3.10 (-0.87%)
Volume$803.05K
Capitalization28.04B
Shinhan Financial Group
Price$65.16
Change+$3.37 (+5.45%)
Volume$271.01K
Capitalization30.17B
BAP vs SHG Comparison Chart in %
BAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAP vs. SHG commentary
Feb 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAP is a StrongBuy and SHG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 08, 2026
Stock price -- (BAP: $353.30 vs. SHG: $65.16)
Brand notoriety: BAP and SHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAP: 191% vs. SHG: 134%
Market capitalization -- BAP: $28.04B vs. SHG: $30.17B
BAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $28.04B. SHG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $30.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $160.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SHG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BAP and SHG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SHG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHG is a better buy in the short-term than BAP.

Price Growth

BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.99% price change this week, while SHG (@Regional Banks) price change was +11.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAP is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

SHG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.80% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHG($30.2B) has a higher market cap than BAP($28B). BAP has higher P/E ratio than SHG: BAP (14.90) vs SHG (9.23). BAP YTD gains are higher at: 23.101 vs. SHG (21.499). BAP has less debt than SHG: BAP (23.5B) vs SHG (129.76T). SHG has higher revenues than BAP: SHG (16.71T) vs BAP (23.3B).
BAPSHGBAP / SHG
Capitalization28B30.2B93%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.10121.499107%
P/E Ratio14.909.23161%
Revenue23.3B16.71T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt23.5B129.76T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAP vs SHG: Fundamental Ratings
BAP
SHG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4112
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
620
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10099
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAP's Valuation (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHG (86) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHG’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SHG (20) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to SHG’s over the last 12 months.

SHG's SMR Rating (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as BAP (4) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SHG’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SHG (41) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to SHG’s over the last 12 months.

SHG's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as BAP (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SHG’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAPSHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KNG52.590.54
+1.04%
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500® Dv Ast Tgt Inc ETF
BAMD32.140.31
+0.98%
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
OCTQ23.88N/A
N/A
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October
QIG44.92N/A
N/A
WisdomTree US Corporate Bond
STPZ53.90-0.01
-0.01%
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF

BAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAP has been closely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAP jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAP
1D Price
Change %
BAP100%
-0.87%
BSAC - BAP
83%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
IFS - BAP
80%
Closely correlated
+1.90%
CIB - BAP
80%
Closely correlated
+2.69%
MOFG - BAP
77%
Closely correlated
+1.32%
BLFY - BAP
75%
Closely correlated
+2.18%
More

SHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHG has been closely correlated with KB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHG jumps, then KB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHG
1D Price
Change %
SHG100%
+5.45%
KB - SHG
81%
Closely correlated
+8.81%
WF - SHG
81%
Closely correlated
+5.77%
MFG - SHG
55%
Loosely correlated
+6.78%
BCH - SHG
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
BAP - SHG
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
More