BAP
Price
$254.06
Change
+$1.41 (+0.56%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
20.16B
25 days until earnings call
PFSB
Price
$12.75
Change
-$0.10 (-0.78%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
21.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAP vs PFSB

Header iconBAP vs PFSB Comparison
Open Charts BAP vs PFSBBanner chart's image
Credi
Price$254.06
Change+$1.41 (+0.56%)
Volume$402.85K
Capitalization20.16B
PFS Ban
Price$12.75
Change-$0.10 (-0.78%)
Volume$6.15K
Capitalization21.02M
BAP vs PFSB Comparison Chart in %
BAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAP vs. PFSB commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAP is a Hold and PFSB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BAP: $254.06 vs. PFSB: $12.75)
Brand notoriety: BAP and PFSB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAP: 113% vs. PFSB: 148%
Market capitalization -- BAP: $20.16B vs. PFSB: $21.02M
BAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $20.16B. PFSB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $21.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePFSB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PFSB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAP is a better buy in the long-term than PFSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFSB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • PFSB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PFSB is a better buy in the short-term than BAP.

Price Growth

BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.36% price change this week, while PFSB (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAP($20.2B) has a higher market cap than PFSB($21M). PFSB has higher P/E ratio than BAP: PFSB (18.75) vs BAP (11.36). BAP YTD gains are higher at: 54.985 vs. PFSB (14.865). BAP has higher revenues than PFSB: BAP (22.6B) vs PFSB (6.17M).
BAPPFSBBAP / PFSB
Capitalization20.2B21M96,190%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD54.98514.865370%
P/E Ratio11.3618.7561%
Revenue22.6B6.17M366,288%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt23.3BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAP: Fundamental Ratings
BAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
4
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAPPFSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
36%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QDWN9.550.10
+1.01%
Dailydelta Q100 Downside Option Strategy ETF
QVMM29.960.10
+0.34%
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Mlt-fctr ETF
BBMC103.630.15
+0.14%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Mid Cap Eq ETF
ARKA68.32N/A
N/A
ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Futures Strategy ETF
PAB43.24-0.06
-0.13%
PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF

BAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAP has been loosely correlated with IFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAP jumps, then IFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAP
1D Price
Change %
BAP100%
+0.56%
IFS - BAP
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
BSAC - BAP
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
SBNY - BAP
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MFG - BAP
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
BBD - BAP
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
More

PFSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PFSB and MBIN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PFSB and MBIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFSB
1D Price
Change %
PFSB100%
-0.78%
MBIN - PFSB
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
EFSI - PFSB
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
BAP - PFSB
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
CCB - PFSB
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
BNPQY - PFSB
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
More