BAP
Price
$354.71
Change
-$8.92 (-2.45%)
Updated
Feb 5, 02:26 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
28.86B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MFG
Price
$9.29
Change
+$0.40 (+4.50%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
114.55B
98 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAP vs MFG

Header iconBAP vs MFG Comparison
Open Charts BAP vs MFGBanner chart's image
Credi
Price$354.71
Change-$8.92 (-2.45%)
Volume$80
Capitalization28.86B
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$9.29
Change+$0.40 (+4.50%)
Volume$6.03M
Capitalization114.55B
BAP vs MFG Comparison Chart in %
BAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAP vs. MFG commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAP is a Buy and MFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BAP: $363.63 vs. MFG: $9.29)
Brand notoriety: BAP and MFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAP: 100% vs. MFG: 161%
Market capitalization -- BAP: $28.86B vs. MFG: $114.55B
BAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $28.86B. MFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $114.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $162.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BAP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BAP and MFG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BAP and MFG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.52% price change this week, while MFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAP is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

MFG is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.41% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($115B) has a higher market cap than BAP($28.9B). MFG has higher P/E ratio than BAP: MFG (17.16) vs BAP (15.36). MFG (26.913) and BAP (26.700) have similar YTD gains . BAP has less debt than MFG: BAP (23.5B) vs MFG (24.87T). MFG has higher revenues than BAP: MFG (3.7T) vs BAP (23.3B).
BAPMFGBAP / MFG
Capitalization28.9B115B25%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.70026.91399%
P/E Ratio15.3617.1689%
Revenue23.3B3.7T1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt23.5B24.87T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAP vs MFG: Fundamental Ratings
BAP
MFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2888
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1919
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAP's Valuation (76) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (78) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (7) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAP (4) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (39) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (19) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAPMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TLTX24.06-0.06
-0.25%
Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Inc ETF
SCHA30.36-0.09
-0.30%
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
NNY8.42-0.03
-0.36%
Nuveen New York Municipal Value Fund
FLTW65.86-0.53
-0.80%
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
BITS57.38-4.45
-7.20%
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Str ETF

BAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAP has been closely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAP jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAP
1D Price
Change %
BAP100%
-3.10%
BSAC - BAP
83%
Closely correlated
-3.31%
CIB - BAP
80%
Closely correlated
-5.73%
MOFG - BAP
77%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
BLFY - BAP
76%
Closely correlated
+2.69%
MFG - BAP
75%
Closely correlated
+4.50%
More

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with PKBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then PKBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
+4.50%
PKBK - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
SUTNY - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
+2.97%
CIB - MFG
70%
Closely correlated
-5.73%
EBMT - MFG
70%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
PNC - MFG
70%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
More