BAP
Price
$263.66
Change
+$0.92 (+0.35%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
20.93B
47 days until earnings call
CMBNF
Price
$91.31
Change
+$25.31 (+38.35%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.33B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAP vs CMBNF

Header iconBAP vs CMBNF Comparison
Open Charts BAP vs CMBNFBanner chart's image
Credi
Price$263.66
Change+$0.92 (+0.35%)
Volume$177.62K
Capitalization20.93B
CEMBRA MONEY BK AG
Price$91.31
Change+$25.31 (+38.35%)
Volume$170
Capitalization3.33B
BAP vs CMBNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAP vs. CMBNF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAP is a Buy and CMBNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BAP: $263.66 vs. CMBNF: $91.31)
Brand notoriety: BAP and CMBNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAP: 49% vs. CMBNF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BAP: $20.93B vs. CMBNF: $3.33B
BAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $20.93B. CMBNF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMBNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMBNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAP is a better buy in the long-term than CMBNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BAP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.40% price change this week, while CMBNF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAP($20.9B) has a higher market cap than CMBNF($3.33B). CMBNF has higher P/E ratio than BAP: CMBNF (14.94) vs BAP (12.06). BAP YTD gains are higher at: 60.841 vs. CMBNF (0.000). CMBNF has less debt than BAP: CMBNF (2.76B) vs BAP (23.3B). BAP has higher revenues than CMBNF: BAP (22.6B) vs CMBNF (550M).
BAPCMBNFBAP / CMBNF
Capitalization20.9B3.33B627%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD60.8410.000-
P/E Ratio12.0614.9481%
Revenue22.6B550M4,109%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt23.3B2.76B845%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAP: Fundamental Ratings
BAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
86
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
4
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAPCMBNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZIPP34.801.50
+4.50%
STKd 100% UBER & 100% TSLA ETF
CAFG25.950.25
+0.97%
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
KRE64.190.30
+0.47%
SPDR® S&P Regional Banking ETF
GSEE55.01-0.22
-0.41%
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emer Mkt Eq ETF
NPFD19.64-0.20
-1.01%
Nuveen Variable Rate Preferred & Income Fund

BAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAP has been loosely correlated with IFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAP jumps, then IFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAP
1D Price
Change %
BAP100%
+0.35%
IFS - BAP
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
BSAC - BAP
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
BCH - BAP
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
BBD - BAP
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
BSBR - BAP
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.81%
More

CMBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBNF has been loosely correlated with BLMIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBNF jumps, then BLMIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBNF
1D Price
Change %
CMBNF100%
N/A
BLMIF - CMBNF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BWAGF - CMBNF
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.43%
BORT - CMBNF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCXS - CMBNF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
BAP - CMBNF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
More