BAP
Price
$251.88
Change
+$1.52 (+0.61%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
19.99B
87 days until earnings call
CMBNF
Price
$91.31
Change
+$25.31 (+38.35%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.32B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAP vs CMBNF

Header iconBAP vs CMBNF Comparison
Open Charts BAP vs CMBNFBanner chart's image
Credi
Price$251.88
Change+$1.52 (+0.61%)
Volume$559.81K
Capitalization19.99B
CEMBRA MONEY BK AG
Price$91.31
Change+$25.31 (+38.35%)
Volume$170
Capitalization3.32B
BAP vs CMBNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAP vs. CMBNF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAP is a Hold and CMBNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BAP: $251.88 vs. CMBNF: $91.31)
Brand notoriety: BAP and CMBNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAP: 177% vs. CMBNF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BAP: $19.99B vs. CMBNF: $3.32B
BAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $19.99B. CMBNF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCMBNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CMBNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAP is a better buy in the long-term than CMBNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.08% price change this week, while CMBNF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAP($20B) has a higher market cap than CMBNF($3.32B). CMBNF has higher P/E ratio than BAP: CMBNF (14.94) vs BAP (12.50). BAP YTD gains are higher at: 53.655 vs. CMBNF (0.000).
BAPCMBNFBAP / CMBNF
Capitalization20B3.32B603%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD53.6550.000-
P/E Ratio12.5014.9484%
RevenueN/A550M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A2.76B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAP: Fundamental Ratings
BAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
4
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAPCMBNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TIISX13.440.04
+0.30%
Nuveen Quant Intl Small Cap Eq R6
WILCX10.70N/A
N/A
Wasatch Global Value Institutional
FAFGX85.04-0.05
-0.06%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F2
MASPX29.63-0.06
-0.20%
BlackRock Advantage SMID Cap Instl
SUWZX37.26-0.13
-0.35%
DWS Core Equity R6

BAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAP has been loosely correlated with IFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAP jumps, then IFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAP
1D Price
Change %
BAP100%
+0.61%
IFS - BAP
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
BSAC - BAP
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GGAL - BAP
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.39%
BCH - BAP
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
BSBR - BAP
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

CMBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBNF has been loosely correlated with BLMIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBNF jumps, then BLMIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBNF
1D Price
Change %
CMBNF100%
N/A
BLMIF - CMBNF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BWAGF - CMBNF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BORT - CMBNF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCXS - CMBNF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BAP - CMBNF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More